Jump to content

Talk:Homeland Security Act of 2002

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Eli Lily?

[edit]

The Homeland Security Act gets five lines while the Eli Lilly rider gets nine? That seems a little off.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.116.119.4 (talk • contribs) 13:59, 2 June 2005

I don't know about Eli Lily page, but this is nothing. Where is the list of powers granted and criticisms of the Act? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.178.170.192 (talk) 03:08, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps you're thinking of the USA PATRIOT Act, one of the major acts granting powers 72.244.206.47 (talk) 03:27, 24 October 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Duplicate?

[edit]

I just noticed there are two of these...

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Ne0Freedom (talk • contribs) 20:26, 29 December 2005

NPOV

[edit]

Civil liberties imperiled by the Homeland Security Act include some constitutional rights, namely: the rights to freedom of speech, religion, assembly and privacy; the rights to counsel and due process; and protection from unreasonable searches and seizures.

Already galvanized by the hasty passage of the earlier USA PATRIOT Act, eighteen cities and towns declared themselves 'civil liberties safe zones' within months after HSA's passage, according to a 2002 Village Voice column. [1]

Concerns about curtailment of civil liberties by the HSA were given a heightened sense of urgency by media revelations in 2002, about another Bush administration initiative, which created a new Pentagon agency under the direction of John Poindexter, known as the Office of Total Information Awareness.

This is not neutral language. - Ta bu shi da yu 15:55, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, definitely not. As much as I hate Bush, this has to be neutral. And it shouldn't consist solely of criticisms. Twilight Realm 08:23, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Also, what about some pro- links? The US Govt. is not the only party thats in favor... Limited Moon 03:08 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Fatal bias

[edit]

First post ever to Wiki. Hope I haven't violated local ettiquette.

As written, the article was fatally biased. Don't know how much explanation this requires, because it seems so plain.

If there's anything to talk about, we'll probably hear.

Regards,

The Autodidactic Polymath 04:26, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ANSI

[edit]

Is there a reason that ANSI is listed as an official US government link? It is a private organization. I would recommend it be moved to a more appropriate category. DanRP (talk) 15:22, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Encyclopedia or Rant Page?

[edit]

Please try to keep this factually based. You may think it is unconstitutional, but until it is declared so, it is not. Even then, until the decision lasts through the appeals process, the decision is tentative. —Preceding unsigned comment added by The Autodidactic Polymath (talk • contribs) 02:51, 21 May 2008

Clean up

[edit]

I made a pass through this short article, add examples of some of the government functions the new department assumed, embedding a "see also" item into the narrative, and limiting external links to those specific to the text of the act (other Wikipedia articles cover the controversy already). I also marked it as a U.S. fed legislation stub. I added two wikiproject templates to this talk page, so perhaps editors interested in the subject as a legislative act will flesh it out. 72.244.206.47 (talk) 03:14, 24 October 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Removed "Degree Programs

[edit]

This section is clearly promotional material for a handful of private for-profit schools offering dubiously useful degrees, has little to nothing to do with this article, and lacks RS anyway. 66.41.65.237 (talk) 20:21, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Homeland Security Act. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:22, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Verifone 480 and Verifone 250?

[edit]

E Unum Pluribus- Out of many "one"? 2600:1700:9F61:C800:A49B:83A9:9B9:616F (talk) 16:41, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Legislative Background

[edit]

This legislation was a Clinton-era proposal revived by Frank Ciluffo, who spent 8 years at the CSIS think tank prior to being appointed to the Bush White House after 9/11. The legislation didn’t appear out of thin air… 2600:8805:3804:F500:D40A:FEE0:B9FD:706B (talk) 01:40, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Homeland_Security_Act_of_2002&oldid=1250021802"