Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evergreen High School
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - kept - SimonP 02:56, May 23, 2005 (UTC)
Non-notable, delete. And, incidently, probably one of dozens of schools with the same name. Neutralitytalk 13:36, May 17, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep - you've heard of disambiguation pages, right? Lupin 14:06, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep schools in wikipedia. --Howrealisreal 14:39, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Oh come on! They've got a great marching band! 2000 students for people who think 500 is too piddling! Lovely stub. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 14:50, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, vanity - but nominator should be warned for WP:POINT. Radiant_* 15:03, May 17, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, as with all the others. - SimonP 15:05, May 17, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, valid stub. Kappa 15:50, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge/Consolidate into an article on the Evergreen school administrative district, or else keep. — RJH 16:18, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep -- Longhair | Talk 17:04, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, expand and echo Radiant. This is too many at once. How can we be expected to expand this many articles at once? It's nuts. Secondary schools are notable. Move to Evergreen High School (Vancouver, Washington) if necessary, but don't delete.--BaronLarf 20:11, May 17, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep as with all the others R Calvete 20:17, 2005 May 17 (UTC)
- Delete. Useless collection of generic facts about an insignificant school. This is not an encyclopedia article. Individual schools are not inherently encyclopedic and there is nothing to distinguish insignificant schools like this one from thousands of nearly identical schools around the world. Gamaliel 20:29, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep the schoolcruft. Ketsuban has spoken. The debate is over. 21:22, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Bogus (non-policy) mass nomination, clogging the VFD system - notability is still not a listed deletion criterion - David Gerard 23:20, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable. Quale 00:01, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per my school article policy. Kelly Martin 02:18, May 18, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete or transwiki to wikischools then delete. Gmaxwell 05:12, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Notable, Verifiable and NPOV. Schools are an excellent entry point for new Wikipedians. --Unfocused 14:34, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge anything salvagable into Schools in (region name) and/or Delete. Master Thief Garrett 03:10, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. *yawn* —RaD Man (talk) 08:01, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Failure to anticipate future disambiguation requirements is not a valid reason for deletion. CalJW 18:49, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete = not notable. NoAccount 03:02, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. We don't even have a policy about schools yet -- hold off on the deletions. Visit Project Schoolwatch. --Zantastik 22:19, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.