Talk:Japanese Bobtail

Cats Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cats. This project provides a central approach to Cat-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.CatsWikipedia:WikiProject CatsTemplate:WikiProject CatsCats articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Japan: Flora and fauna Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 20:17, October 24, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Flora and fauna task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Archives

Archive 1

Breed standard section

This section needs improvement. For one thing, it should be real prose not a clipped "checklist". See Turkish Van#Breed standard for an example. Secondly, it needs to be clear on what aspects of this aggregated summarized standard are different in some standards and which they are (with citations). — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ʕ(^Õل^ō)ˀ Contribs. 19:33, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bogus sources

Please be on the lookout for spammy attempts to insert links to breeder sites and directories as "sources". I've recently removed two of these. They may take the form of short summaries of the breed, cobbled together from memory or perhaps from uncited publsihed sources, but they do not constitute reliable sources for Wikipedian purposes, and do not help establish verifiability. They are generally also a conflict of interest, inserted by people promoting the site, and violate our external linking standards. Such links are common in cat and dog articles and frequently reverted, but tend to stick around in articles like this one, about smaller breeds with few regular editors. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ʕ(^Õل^ō)ˀ Contribs. 19:33, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]