Jump to content

Talk:Maria Emanuel, Margrave of Meissen

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  • Maria Emanuel in Spanish - Seth Ilys 16:58, 9 Mar 2004 (UTC)
    • Translated: German noble, stub article, I guess being nominal Prince of Saxony is (barely) encyclopedia-worthy. I cannot vouch for the accuracy of some of the facts, just the translation. -- Jmabel 23:09, 9 Mar 2004 (UTC)
      • How can a MARIA Emanuel be a he and a prince? Perhaps its Emanuel Maria? Muriel 11:52, 11 Mar 2004 (UTC)
        • That's really his name. Surprised me at first, too. You can find plenty of references to him on the web in obviously well-researched articles, just do a search. I do not know how that came to be his name, but it is. -- Jmabel 07:05, 12 Mar 2004 (UTC)
          • Ok then... But it is strange. Muriel 11:28, 13 Mar 2004 (UTC)

<end From Wikipedia:Pages needing translation into English>


I can make no sense of "this decision is deleted by..." -- Jmabel 22:04, 25 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Whoops..."disputed by" john 05:46, 26 Mar 2004 (UTC)

English?

[edit]

If anyone can parse "including the Margraves brother Albert who supports his cousin Timo’s morganatic born son Rüdiger who has three sons", please turn it into something clearer. Thanks. - Jmabel | Talk 05:53, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Polish throne

[edit]

It's woth to mention that prince Maria Emanuel never put any claims to Polish throne: he is a candidate of some traditionalists organisation in Poland. A.J. 12:07, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead an add it, if you like. Was the throne of Poland actually hereditary through the Wettin dynasty though? I thought it was always elective. Charles 14:06, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not very sure about my English skills (see en-2 in my Babel tower). The polish throne was hereditary in Piast and Jagiellonian dynasty, then elective (I'm not a historitian so I don't know if tere was a Wettin elected or not..). The 3rd May Constutution changed that, and sinse king Stanislaus August Poniatowski had no sons, throne passed to Wettin dynasty: and these organisations I told before say, that the constutution was never exlplicitly overrluled, alhough the Regency Council passed the power to Józef Piłsudzki and shortly after Sejm declared new Polish Republic. A.J. 11:05, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Extensive recent uncited edits

[edit]

I notice extensive recent uncited edits, including changes of names of people referred to. This article is way outside my competence, I am not going to attempt to fix anything, just raising a flag. One thing I will point to, though, is that I seriously question whether "Hereditacies", now a section header in this article, is even a word in English or any other language. - Jmabel | Talk 08:10, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

titles

[edit]

Does anyone know what titles he is heir to? His coat of arms seems to make some claims although Ernestine cousins full titles doesn't represent all their quarters, especially some of those quarters that all Wettin's share. I am in the process of researching, but so far the best that I can do, is assume that the Albertines are also Dukes of Angria and Westphalia, Landgraves in Thuringia, Princely Counts of Henneberg, but I don't want to assume. Tinynanorobots (talk) 18:31, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Issue.

[edit]

Why didn't he have children? 37.144.53.146 (talk) 16:13, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What kind of question is that? It isn't a given that every person should or can have children.--The Emperor's New Spy (talk) 04:15, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]