Talk:Military of the Faroe Islands
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 10 October 2005. The result of the discussion was merge and redirect to Faroe Islands. |
Untitled
[edit]Danish military runs a NATO radar base on the Faroes. The soldiers are sitting in the base of Mjørkdalur: http://home19.inet.tele.dk/mdl Arne List 22:20, 22 May 2004 (UTC)
Please note this article was removed from category:militaries by User:Huaiwei [1]. — Instantnood 18:38, July 19, 2005 (UTC)
- Your point being?--Huaiwei 18:54, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
- To notify other wikipedians that such an edit to the article was made. — Instantnood 19:25, July 19, 2005 (UTC)
- Their watchlists and article history don't tell them that? SchmuckyTheCat 21:40, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
- Not every wikipedian reading this article is having it in her/his watchlist. When time goes by there will be many pages of history for this article. — Instantnood 20:02, July 20, 2005 (UTC)
- So who do you think will have this article in their watchlist? And who will want to go through mountains of history to come to this?--Huaiwei 13:18, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
- That's why I put a short note here on this talk page. — Instantnood 13:26, July 21, 2005 (UTC)
- My question is who. Answer my question and dont evade it.--Huaiwei 13:34, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
- I've not idea who will have this article in their watchlist, and who will want to go through the history of the article. I'm interested to know why you're asking me such questions. — Instantnood 13:40, July 21, 2005 (UTC)
- If you have no idea who you are doing this for, when why do you do this? Your claims of ignorance dosent tally with your actions, it seems.--Huaiwei 14:03, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
- Interesting.. Schmucky asked me why watchlist and history can't do the same, and you took this as an opportunity to challenge why I had to do so. Do I have to designate a target group to have something being noted in a talk page? — Instantnood 14:09, July 21, 2005 (UTC)
- What has my simple question gotta do with him? As for the "target group", if you have one, please tell us who they are. If they are none, then you have even more reason to explain why you did the above actions, because otherwise it will make no sense. Again, I am demanding an answer.--Huaiwei 14:46, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
- To repeat, do I have to designate a target group to have something being noted in a talk page? The target is obviously anybody who would arrive at this talk page. — Instantnood 15:13, July 21, 2005 (UTC)
- And I repeat. Your failure in answering this question will suggest a lack of a "target" when initiating an "action". Logic tells us this usually does not happen. Your refusal to answer the questions suggests you are hiding an agenda. So, you answer it, or not answer it, you are already at a loosing end.--Huaiwei 15:21, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
- It's so interesting you can come up with an assumption in this way. Alright I now declare myself the loser and u're the winner. Congratulations~ — Instantnood 15:37, July 21, 2005 (UTC)
- But its not my assumption dear. Its psychological. And who cares if you are the loser and who is the winner? I am still demanding an answer to the above.--Huaiwei 07:37, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
- It's so interesting you can come up with an assumption in this way. Alright I now declare myself the loser and u're the winner. Congratulations~ — Instantnood 15:37, July 21, 2005 (UTC)
- And I repeat. Your failure in answering this question will suggest a lack of a "target" when initiating an "action". Logic tells us this usually does not happen. Your refusal to answer the questions suggests you are hiding an agenda. So, you answer it, or not answer it, you are already at a loosing end.--Huaiwei 15:21, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
- To repeat, do I have to designate a target group to have something being noted in a talk page? The target is obviously anybody who would arrive at this talk page. — Instantnood 15:13, July 21, 2005 (UTC)
- What has my simple question gotta do with him? As for the "target group", if you have one, please tell us who they are. If they are none, then you have even more reason to explain why you did the above actions, because otherwise it will make no sense. Again, I am demanding an answer.--Huaiwei 14:46, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
- Interesting.. Schmucky asked me why watchlist and history can't do the same, and you took this as an opportunity to challenge why I had to do so. Do I have to designate a target group to have something being noted in a talk page? — Instantnood 14:09, July 21, 2005 (UTC)
- If you have no idea who you are doing this for, when why do you do this? Your claims of ignorance dosent tally with your actions, it seems.--Huaiwei 14:03, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
- I've not idea who will have this article in their watchlist, and who will want to go through the history of the article. I'm interested to know why you're asking me such questions. — Instantnood 13:40, July 21, 2005 (UTC)
- My question is who. Answer my question and dont evade it.--Huaiwei 13:34, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
- That's why I put a short note here on this talk page. — Instantnood 13:26, July 21, 2005 (UTC)
- So who do you think will have this article in their watchlist? And who will want to go through mountains of history to come to this?--Huaiwei 13:18, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
- Not every wikipedian reading this article is having it in her/his watchlist. When time goes by there will be many pages of history for this article. — Instantnood 20:02, July 20, 2005 (UTC)
- Their watchlists and article history don't tell them that? SchmuckyTheCat 21:40, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
- To notify other wikipedians that such an edit to the article was made. — Instantnood 19:25, July 19, 2005 (UTC)
Missing article
[edit]Would there be any reason why there isn't an article on this topic, whereas there's one for Greenland? Is the Faroe Islands not as autonomous as Greenland in defence matters? Apart from Greenland there are also similar Wikipedia articles on Åland, Aruba, Bermuda, the Falkland Islands, the British Virgin Islands, and so on. 220.246.55.231 (talk) 14:03, 27 January 2021 (UTC)