User talk:Bletch

Hello Bletch and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

• To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes).
• Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
• If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
• Follow the Wikipedia:Simplified Ruleset
• Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
• Remember Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
• Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck!

Kate's counting tool: [1]

need your help on two RFCs

Please visit these pages and post a comment in support with an example of how this is true. Thanks

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/User:Gamaliel http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/User:Robert_McClenon 24.147.97.230 17:19, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

Unicode

You accidentically deleted the Wikilinks to the alphabbets with your last edit. Are you still working on the article? If I see no update from you in the next 15 minutes, I'll clean up. Pjacobi 15:34, 12 Aug 2004 (UTC)

No permanent damage done. Everything is safe in the article history. But I have a question: Didn't you see that you were overwriting a newer version? There is some speculation, that for unknown reasons some users don't see the newest version and consequently tend to overwrite information in the articles. -- Pjacobi 19:55, 12 Aug 2004 (UTC)

I definitely didn't see the new version, but I am not sure if it Wiki's fault of a simple oversight on my part. It does seem weird that it doesn't look out for "Mid air colisions" the way that Bugzilla does though... Bletch 20:03, 12 Aug 2004 (UTC)

It does. That's the weird thing. You should get an edit conflict warning. I try to report to the developers, perhaps you can become tester for this defect, if we can reproduce it. -- Pjacobi 20:15, 12 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Boston and NYC meetups

Hey Bletch,

There's a meetup in New York this Saturday, and another in Boston the following week. I hope you can make it to one of them. +sj+ 00:24, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)

There is a meetup in NYC scheduled for Sunday, December 12 as well. (same link) – Ram-Man ^{(comment) (talk)}[[]] 23:29, Dec 8, 2004 (UTC)

Abimael Guzmán

Hi, I noticed your name in the talk page of Abimael Guzmán in the discussion about the photo. I have just replaced it with a decent portrait of him; I agree that the "jailbird" image was pure gov. propaganda. I hope you will agree with this and some other edits I just made to the article. On a more general note, there seem to be several POV warriors haunting these pages (cf, Shining Path and others). Any help in maintaining editorial equilibrium would be most appreciated. All the best, -- Viajero 20:50, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Hi again, just a quick comment: I had integrated the location where he was incarcerated higher up in the text; I guess you didn't notice in the diff. -- Viajero 09:00, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Falklands

Hi Bletch, I reverted your edit of Lyndon LaRouche, as the Falklands-Malvinas was agreed as a neutral term for the war. It gets about 12,000 hits on Google, though some of those may be Wikipedia's mirror sites, but a lot seem not to be. Hope that's okay. SlimVirgin 23:05, Mar 19, 2005 (UTC)

Punctuation

Hello! Regarding your change [2], I must confess that I am confused. I have always assumed that the logical view on brackets should be that the sentence should remain grammatically correct when the bracketed expression is removed. That would mean that periods go within the brackets if and only if the sentences they terminate were also opened within the brackets. This is also the rule in my native tongue (which is Swedish). Now, seeing that you are a native English speaker I can only assume that you are correct and that the rules for this in English are less natural than I had thought. You don't happen to have a style guide for matters like these to point me to so I can learn more about a part of your language of which I have obviously been ignorant? Regards, Jao 17:19, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)

Caps

Champagne should be in caps I think - it is a place name.

sorry, yes you are right, as the article is split by place vs drink. I do wish the initial caps thing on article names wasnt there - I just noticed I have accidentally capitalised lots of grape names by mistake (as have lots of other people...). Justinc 23:53, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)

iraq election quoting not required

The sentence is already caveated at the beginning by stating "They claim..." so it should be clear the source itself is claiming that for the iraq elections to have meaning the U.S. should not be orchestrating the process. Adding quotes there, as you did, only creates confusion. The entire article is a summary of the official position on the iraqi elections, so why should criticisms require "quotations"? zen master T 13:05, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Links between Iraq and Al-Qaeda

Could you please vote on the proposed move Links between Iraq and Al-Qaeda → Alleged links between pre-invasion Iraq and Al-Qaeda? The vote is here . Thanks. ObsidianOrder 17:08, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

RfA

Thanks for supporting my adminship. Cheers, -Willmcw 05:26, Jun 27, 2005 (UTC)

William Westmoreland quote

Hi- I see you moved William Westmoreland's quote to wikiquote. I think it is fine to have quotes there, but I don't think that a single one-sentence quote on the wikipedia page clutters up the article. If we were talking about multiple quotes or a paragraph or more, that would be one thing, but I think this short quote says a lot about the man and should stay on his main article page.--Rogerd 17:42, July 25, 2005 (UTC)

Gamaliel

Gamaliel has threatend a revert war on Joe Scarborough. Check out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Gamaliel#Joe_Scarbourough 67.18.109.218 18:06, 29 July 2005 (UTC)

Hollywood accounting

Hey, remember that discussion you participated in, on the talk page for Forrest Gump, about how Winston Groom didn't get his fair share of the money? You described it as "one of those reverse-Enron situations where the accountants do tricks to make the movie have close to zero profit", and said you'd create an article if you knew what to call it. It's called Hollywood accounting, and do you want to help polish it up? DS 01:45, 2 August 2005 (UTC)

Awp!

Yes. I did do that, and that was a screw up on my part. I had meant to restore your incident notice, but I had forgotten to. What you were supposed to do is copy and paste the template (User, article, difftimes, etc) ABOVE the first line. Not sure exactly what you did, but the template got destroyed.

I do apologize for not restoring or atleast notifying you. That was a major mistake on my part. My only excuse is stress and lack of sleep ^_^;;;

--Tznkai 15:18, 11 August 2005 (UTC)

I have restored it now 2 days on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR#User:Cognition , and he has been blocked. Can't see what the problem was, SqueakBox 03:01, August 13, 2005 (UTC)

Johnny Barnes

I'm sorry I didn't respond to your message on Johnny Barnes, I thought you had gone ahead and changed the stub, since I was clearly wrong.--Carabinieri 13:43, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

Thought you...

Thought you might want to see this:

Flying Humanoids

There is a Aztec or Mayan pix of these things, and people have shot videotape of these things.

To see this videotape link, see this link:Click on the RED videotape link Warning, this videotape may have language issues. Martial Law 23:37, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

Corrected a bad link. Martial Law 23:41, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

Flying humanoids

I know you probably meant well but in this edit you removed the AfD notice, which is not supposed to be removed until the deletion process is finished. --Cyde Weys _vote^talk 23:57, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

Third World vote

Hi Bletch! I saw that you voted for the inclusion of Southeastern Europe as "Maybe" on a Third World map, while you voted "No" for so-called Eastern Europe (including the former Soviet Republics of Europe). I'm curious to know why you consider the Southeastern European countries as "maybe Third World", and the other countries, particularly Russia, Ukraine and Belarus, as definitely not Third World. I'm not trying to get you to change your vote or anything, and definitely not asking for any justification, I'm just curious about people's perceptions of Southeastern Europe in particular, and post-Communist Europe in general. Thanks, Ronline ✉ 11:29, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. --Scott Grayban 14:40, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Cuba

I see that you have been edit warring with User:Comandante. Instead of edit-warring, please use the talk page of the article. If you continue to revert the article for any reason other than to remove vandalism, you will be blocked for violation of the 3RR rule.--Shanel 14:48, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

RfC help and Civil Commitment

Need your help/support on RfC on Adam here and would like to get the info on civil commitment in the Human rights in the United States article. Civil Commitment certainly violates rights even if it meant in good faith to prevent more crimes. It affects the ones that wouldn't. --Scott Grayban 12:48, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

*** Important - Your input requested ASAP ***

Please see this Wikipedia:Deletion review#Rationales_to_impeach_George_W._Bush.

Merecat 00:25, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

---

• Please tell me what you think of this: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rationales to impeach George W. Bush (3rd nomination).
• You can leave your message on this talk page here.

---

Cuba

I saw your edits there and I think you are doing a good job. That article seems to attract trouble. Keep up the good work. 09:17, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

Jim Shapiro

Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Shapiro and AN. Tyrenius 08:12, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

There's always waybackmachine. Old web articles can be referenced, if you have exact URL and date accessed. They would have to be acceptable ones though. Tyrenius 11:32, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Perhaps, but I for one don't know of any articles that fully convey the audacity and (local) ubiquitousness of his advertising practices or his cult following, other than this one [3]. I'd love to be wrong on this one. --Bletch 11:44, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

I have replaced the AFD notice on the article, seeing as the discussion is ongoing. Kevin 14:54, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Re. commentators. They can be referred to and quoted directly, provided it can be verified from a reliable source, which a newspaper would be, or a known individual on the internet, but not just an unknown blogger. Tyrenius 15:11, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

It's entirely up to you what you do. It was deleted as SPEEDY A6 attack page, namely:

1. Attack pages. Articles that serve no purpose but to disparage their subject or some other entity (e.g., "John Citizen is a moron"). This includes a biography of a living person that is negative in tone and unsourced, where there is no NPOV version in the history to revert to.

You can accept that, or, if not, your option is at Undeletion policy], namely to request a Deletion review. This should not be taken as any comment by me on the deletion itself, but is just to acquaint you with procedures. Tyrenius 18:30, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

I'm sure there's far more productive things to get on with. Doubtless in future you'll be nailing those references in! Tyrenius 22:35, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Obviously I spoke too soon! By the way, I tried to send you an email when the RfA first appeared to tell you about it, and you weren't on wiki, but you don't seem to have that option enabled? Tyrenius 03:11, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Jim “the hammer” Shapiro

Main Sources

Old files of Shapiro’s web site [4]

Here’s a sample page: [5]

Promotional site making claims for Shapiro + give him a ring + more background & nice things [6]

Legal Ethics Resources on the Web, prepared by Brad Wendel, Associate Professor of Law, Cornell University School of Law – includes Shapiro [7]

Litigation online – Canadian Medical Association [8]

Shapiro in Motor magazine, 2002 [9]

From Buffalo News NY 2006 – restrictions on advertising, mentions Shapiro [10]

Brand Week 1999 – “a one-second TV spot that gained him national media attention” [11]

Rochester Democrat and Chronicle – good stories, but you have to pay [12]=

The Daily Orange – S.O.B. Lawyer validates his title (+ Robert Williams quote) [13]

Overlawyered [14] [15] [16] [17]

Lawyer Ads get loud on prairielaw.com [18]

Shapiro’s books

“Sue the Bastards” – book by Shapiro [19]

Chapter 1 of “Million Dollar Lungs” book by Shapiro [20]

Shapiro in web culture

(Blogs show people still talk about him)

Song about Shapiro! [21]

Poem mentions Shapiro [22]

A poet mentions Shapiro [23]

Syracuse uni student – people who have influenced me – Shapiro [24]

A blog: “(The mind reels that Wikipedia has an entry on Jim "The Hammer" Shapiro. Wikipedia knows all.)” [25]

Blog on Shapiro [26]

Shapiro mentioned on Rochester designer web site [27]

Someone fakes Shapiro on friendster – Rochester City News [28]

Jim the Hammer Shapiro (fake page shut down as can be seen in Friends section) on MySpace.com – again showing his continuing appeal [29]

“Who I’d like to meet section” for Kirsten on MySpace – Jim the Hammer Shapiro (only in cached version) [30]

Associated Press story

Below from www.nylawyer.com story credited to The Associated Press (renowned international news agency). NB you can get the story by registering free on this site and searching for the title) ‘’’NY Lawyer Known for Ads Suspended’’’ New York Lawyer May 3, 2004 By The Associated Press ROCHESTER, N.Y. -- Attorney James "Jim the Hammer" Shapiro, known for his television advertising, has been suspended from practicing law in New York state for a year. The Appellate Division of state Supreme Court said Shapiro's commercials were misleading and he impermissibly tried to solicit business from a comatose accident victim. The suspension resulted from a petition by the Grievance Committee of the 7th Judicial District. Shapiro said from his Florida home that the ruling is "unfair and unconstitutional" but has little effect. He sold his Rochester-based law firm six months ago, he said. The court faulted Shapiro's ads that said he will take certain actions on behalf of clients "when, in fact, respondent has not practiced law in a number of years and intended to take no action on behalf of any client." Shapiro said clients who responded to his ads were told up front that he wouldn't be representing them personally. He said the letter to the comatose woman told her to call for information only when she was better.

Use or delete as you wish. Tyrenius 06:36, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

DRV

Bletch, I noticed your vote on the Jim Shapiro DRV was moved to the subpage. You might want to replace it onto the main page so that it gets counted. Powers 12:22, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Eastern world

Hi, thanks for the message. I really have no idea what happened there. I remember nothing. Must be the drink. Paul B 21:32, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

SmartGenealogy appears to be freeware, but not free software

Bletch, you are right I saw freeware and equated it with well free! Gioto 01:03, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Albigensian Crusade

I'm contacting you out of courtesy as you have contributed to the page and may wish to supply your own citations. If you feel this doesn't matter to you, please ignore it. This page was rated as a Good Article, but has been downgraded because nobody did the donkeywork of listing the attributions to the various statements provided, which is after all a fairly serious dereliction of duty in what's suppoed to be a historical record. Having discussed the withdrawal of GA with LuciferMorgan, I give notice that I am sitting down with the three classic original source texts (Puylaurens, Vaux-de-Cernay and de Tudèle - the last in the Livre de Poche edition as the Martin-Chabot is long out of print) to add the missing inline citations to this page. I do not intend at this point to make any textual alterations, but if comments are made which are NOT justified, be prepared to state your sources now.

Jel 20:39, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Blaster-flamethrower.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Blaster-flamethrower.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:07, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Shapiro.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Shapiro.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 17:01, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Robby Todino

I have nominated Robby Todino, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robby Todino. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Scott MacDonald (talk) 20:57, 25 October 2008 (UTC) Scott MacDonald (talk) 20:57, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

AfD

Please see: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biographical Dictionary of the Extreme Right Since 1890 (2nd nomination), which you contributed to. Steve Dufour (talk) 03:13, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Nomination of James Chanos for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Chanos is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Chanos until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. causa sui (talk) 17:59, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Park Sang-hak

Hello, Bletch,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Park Sang-hak should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Park Sang-hak .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Travelbird (talk) 04:17, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Peter Coffee for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peter Coffee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Coffee until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:37, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Pizzeria Napoli (Baghdad) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pizzeria Napoli (Baghdad) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pizzeria Napoli (Baghdad) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sitush (talk) 15:00, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Bletch. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Bletch. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Laudo Hayes Firm Day

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Laudo Hayes Firm Day, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Smjg (talk) 11:39, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Bletch. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Glock 3

The article Glock 3 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Source searches turn up no significant coverage with just passing mentions. Fails notability standards.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. StraussInTheHouse (talk) 18:32, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Left-wing terrorism

Hi, I've listed Left-Wing terrorism in Articles for Deletion. You were involved previously when it was discussed and you may be interested. AlanS^talk 09:08, 29 July 2023 (UTC)