Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Peppermint
This image was previously a featured picture and was renominated as it never went through the featured picture candidates process.
- Support. Clear and straightforward, illustrative image. -- [[User:Solitude|Solitude\talk]] 10:04, Dec 7, 2004 (UTC)
- Support. – Quadell (talk) (help)[[]] 14:01, Dec 7, 2004 (UTC)
- Support. -- Chris 73 Talk 00:06, Dec 8, 2004 (UTC)
- Support Lorax 01:04, Dec 8, 2004 (UTC)
- Support. [[User:Neutrality|Neutrality/talk]] 04:23, Dec 8, 2004 (UTC)
- Support. -Lommer 20:12, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Neutral. Lacks clarity and sharpness, perhaps Photoshop touch-up in store? Enochlau 01:57, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Oppose. Its a fine illustration of the difference between Peppermint and Corsican mint, but the peppermint article doesn't have much to say and the only mention of Corsican mint is at mint (so might as well add the picture there). Apart from that, the photo is not so sharp and not especially interesting. -- Solipsist 08:14, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Oppose. Suffers from compression. Not very interesting. ed g2s • talk 22:22, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Oppose. Janderk 16:00, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Oppose. Not particularly interesting. - Jpo 18:56, Dec 13, 2004 (UTC)
- Support --ScottyBoy900Q∞ 22:20, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Oppose. Agree with Ed g2s --Fir0002 04:34, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Support - [[User:Bevo|Bevo]] 15:24, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)