Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2005 May 3
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 13:16, 10 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
One entry, and that irrelevant. --bjh21 23:46, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, empty K1Bond007 21:35, May 5, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. I have no idea what would go in this category, and the description - "The perfect way to get the wang." - is most unhelpful. --Azkar 00:38, 6 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 13:16, 10 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Empty. CfD notice was added on Dec 18. --Kbdank71 20:43, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 13:28, 10 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Empty. CfD notice was added on February 24. --Kbdank71 20:37, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was rename --Kbdank71 15:59, 10 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
CfR notice was added on May 2. Anon wants to rename to Category:Federation Starfleet ship classes --Kbdank71 20:34, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment, wouldn't it better named "Federation ship classes"? Isn't Starfleet just a subsection of the Federation or something similar? Or if they want a more precise name shouldn't it just be "Starfleet ship classes"? K1Bond007 21:45, May 5, 2005 (UTC)
- I think "Starfleet ship classes" would be most accurate. Starfleet is the military branch of the Federation. The Federation may have other vessels that are non-military, but I doubt there's much need to write Wikipedia articles about merchant vessels. Most of this category's sister-categories in Category:Star Trek ship classes aren't pre-fixed by "Star Trek" (i.e. Category:Romulan ship classes, not Category:Star Trek Romulan ship classes), and I don't see too much of an issue with ambiguity, so I'll vote rename to Category: Starfleet ship classes. --Azkar 23:02, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree with that. Rename to Category:Starfleet ship classes. K1Bond007 00:06, May 6, 2005 (UTC)
- I think "Starfleet ship classes" would be most accurate. Starfleet is the military branch of the Federation. The Federation may have other vessels that are non-military, but I doubt there's much need to write Wikipedia articles about merchant vessels. Most of this category's sister-categories in Category:Star Trek ship classes aren't pre-fixed by "Star Trek" (i.e. Category:Romulan ship classes, not Category:Star Trek Romulan ship classes), and I don't see too much of an issue with ambiguity, so I'll vote rename to Category: Starfleet ship classes. --Azkar 23:02, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- COMMENT the StarFleet ship classes in that category are only the Federation ships. There's an Category:Star Trek Earth ship classes that contains the NX class starship, which is pre-Federation. 132.205.15.43 01:11, 6 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Well the NX class is Starfleet so if it were to be renamed Category:Starfleet ship classes then those can be changed to this new one and that "Star Trek Earth ship classes" could probably be deleted. K1Bond007 02:14, May 6, 2005 (UTC)
- But Starfleet isn't Starfleet. It'd be like putting 13 colonies colonial militia into the US army. 132.205.45.110 21:43, 6 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Well the NX class is Starfleet so if it were to be renamed Category:Starfleet ship classes then those can be changed to this new one and that "Star Trek Earth ship classes" could probably be deleted. K1Bond007 02:14, May 6, 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 13:28, 10 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Empty. CfD notice was added on March 9. --Kbdank71 20:23, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 13:28, 10 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Empty. CfD notice was added on December 4. --Kbdank71 19:44, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 13:28, 10 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Empty. CfD notice was added on December 4. --Kbdank71 19:44, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was move info to list --Kbdank71 15:44, 10 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Empty. CfD notice was added on December 4. --Kbdank71 19:35, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Reinstate please - Thank You very much. I just discovered this empty page today on the towns in the Region of Basilicata and so I have entered the names of the towns divided by province. --San Fele 02:25, 10 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Err .. the content on this page should be moved to a list. If there aren't articles about these towns to put in this category, delete it after listing. --Azkar 02:38, 10 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was rename --Kbdank71 15:33, 10 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
CfR notice was added on April 2. Rename to Category:Towns in Denmark --Kbdank71 19:31, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Support rename, similar to others in Category:Towns by country. K1Bond007 03:11, May 6, 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was rename --Kbdank71 15:33, 10 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
CfR notice was added on April 2. Rename to Category:Towns in Luxembourg --Kbdank71 19:28, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Support, similar to others in Category:Towns by country. K1Bond007 03:13, May 6, 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 13:28, 10 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Empty. CfD notice was added on December 3. Duplicate of Category:Turkish Navy submarines --Kbdank71 19:09, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 13:28, 10 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Empty. CfD notice was added on March 10 with edit summary of superseded by categ Astronomical objects --Kbdank71 17:30, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- It would still work if it were recategorized under Category:Astronomical objects. I don't see an unidentified astronomical objects category. 132.205.15.43 22:53, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 15:06, 10 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
CfD notice was added on February 17 by creator. Edit summary: created in error - didn't spot the West / East Sussex divide --Kbdank71 17:12, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 13:28, 10 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
CfD notice was added on March 20. Empty; replaced with Category:Villages in Georgia (U.S. state) --Kbdank71 17:12, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 13:28, 10 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
CfD notice was added on December 2. Empty category. --Kbdank71 16:58, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 13:28, 10 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
CfD notice was added on April 3rd. Empty category. --Kbdank71 16:35, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, empty and not all that useful. K1Bond007 07:01, May 6, 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 14:40, 10 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
CfD notice was added on April 20th, but it was never listed here. Edit summary: redundant & orphan category see category:People from Yukon --Kbdank71 16:21, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 14:40, 10 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Duplication of a correctly named, pre-existing category Category:Education in South Australia. Should be deleted.
- Delete--Cyberjunkie 14:54, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. --Kbdank71 15:05, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. --ScottDavis 00:10, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 13:16, 10 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Made obsolete by Category:Streets and squares of Warsaw. Halibutt 05:00, May 3, 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.