Talk:Test Stand VII

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / European / German / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War II task force

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Who called it "arena" — the Germans, or Allied intelligence? Should it be capitalized? Also, can someone interpret the bit about the bombing damage? (Does it mean that the damage was cleared and testing restarted in Nov '44? Did the massive '43 air raid mentioned in the Peenemünde article also damage it? Is someone confusing the two air raids?) Finally, is "close-in television" supposed to mean "closed circuit television"? Please help with the cleanup. — B.Bryant 21:23, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Assessed as B-class

I've just assessed this article as B-class. The only thing it was missing was structure, so I split it into three sections with logical titles, and then passed it as B-class. Comments and corrections welcomed. Carcharoth (talk) 11:06, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What is with the names in bold, and with the last names (only) linked to generic wikipedia pages on the use of that name and not to refer to an individual? The format seems at odds with the norm, and the linking of no value. DulcetTone (talk) 06:32, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Aerial Photo Query

The aerial photographs of Test Stand (Pruefstand) VII cannot be correctly titled. The stand appears heavily damaged on 12th June 1943 and in perfect working order on 23rd June 1943. Either they are not showing the same Test Stand or the captions are incorrect. 188.223.182.41 (talk) 19:55, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Aerial Photo Query

The aerial photographs of Test Stand (Pruefstand) VII cannot be correctly titled. The stand appears heavily damaged on 12th June 1943 and in perfect working order on 23rd June 1943. Either they are not showing the same Test Stand or the captions are incorrect. 188.223.182.41 (talk) 19:55, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Launch Description

The quote uses imperial units, like feet and yards. Since Dornberger was German it's pretty unlikely he used them in 1943. Although the text is of course translated measurements shouldn't be converted. --StYxXx (talk) 01:52, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Test Stand VII. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20120731094333/http://www.dera.de/195.0.html to http://www.dera.de/195.0.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:51, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]