Talk:Magick Image File Format

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computer graphics Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer graphics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer graphics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer graphicsWikipedia:WikiProject Computer graphicsTemplate:WikiProject Computer graphicscomputer graphics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Untitled

from VfD:

Geekcruft. Less notable than XBin, garners a weak 1100 hits in google. [1] —RaD Man (talk) 08:43, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Delete. As far as I know, the format is almost never used. --Carnildo 08:46, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Delete, I don't see it (nn). Wyss 18:48, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Keep potentially useful info. this article is doing no harm, why mess with it? if it is truly bothersome, just merge with ImageMagick and redirect. Wolfman 01:24, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
keep' Yuckfoo 04:50, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Merge with ImageMagick, don't redirect. --fvw * 08:04, 2004 Dec 20 (UTC)
ImageMagick is very popular and widely used; I can see how someone might end up searching or linking to this article. Either keep or redirect to ImageMagick. —Psychonaut 17:24, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Keep. This information is much more relevant than the number of hits on Google. [[User:GRider|GRider\^talk]] 17:28, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Merge and redirect with ImageMagick. Poccil Peter O. (Talk, automation script)[[]] 07:29, Dec 23, 2004 (UTC)
Keep - there is no valid reason to put this forward for deletion. "Geekcruft" is not listed in the deletion policy - David Gerard 23:06, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Keep - It's informitive and useful. I see no reason to kill it --Fyrefiend 06:36, Dec 24, 2004 (UTC)
Keep. "*cruft" is a lousy basis to present for deletion, this looks like it fits under the Wikipedia umbrella to me. Bryan 20:54, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)

end moved discussion