This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
The article is definitely unneccessarily positive, which is a bit of a pity to note given how that's roughly my feelings. Can someone who's well versed in musical history rewrite it to be a bit more neutral? I'm unsure I could make it any more that, given my bias. - pinkgothic14:23, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Just a quick note that I've not changed much of the wording. I've only just started the Noko biography page and copied out the bits referring to that to the new page, aswell as add in links. This is just a note in case someone saw my edits and wasn't sure if my above note is still to be considered a valid request. It is. - pinkgothic16:15, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I know, it fairly glows. Believe it or not this is the version after I'd toned it down. But I'm not sure any call to someone more versed in musical history is going to work: subjectivity reigns and the only way to deal with it is to ditch all the positive terms. As the original "author" I'm not going to do that! But in the spirit of wiki someone else can and I'd welcome it. - Robin726 19:01, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I guess the two of us will wait for a good while for that to happen, then, since as mentioned, I'm far too biased and in agreeance with the wording. pinkgothic14:18, 16 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
