User talk:Gengiskanhg
Nice picture, could you provide attribution? Note that Wikipedia policy is that all materials must be either your own property which you are prepared to release under the GNU Free Documentation License, public domain or fair use. Dhodges 02:02, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Chess template Translate aid
[edit]Hello I am working at first on es.wikipedia.org,
Can you help me with information about how to translate the chess board template?
I affraid the little images with this is based are not in wikimedia:commons, either in en.wikipedia, then the traslation to other languages are hard. Is this correct?
Can other wikipedias use templates from other languages?
Thanks
A copy of these questions are on the chess board template discussion.
--Gengiskanhg 22:49, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- I've replied at Template talk:Chess position#Translate aid. dbenbenn | talk 23:23, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
In [1] the chessboard is stored at "Bild:Zugzwang.PNG" in german WP. Ok, I know I should transport it to commons. hopefully I will do it in near future. I created this board with the software ChessBase 8.0. -- 192.77.114.102 07:45, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC) (user tsor from german WP)
- In the template talk:Chess position I have written a notice on the Danish chessboard. It uses the same way of insertion, but has different colours and a more "closed" look with border and letters/numbers on all sides. DK-User Sir48, profile in English
- In addition, you may combine the English template with the Danish brown tiles, because they have been uploaded as well, see template:Chess_tiles_brown. If you change the image name in the English template from Image:Chess_xxxx.png to Image:Chs2_xxxx.png you will have the boards in brown colour. (But without the frame etc. from the full solution above) DK-User Sir48, profile in English
I moved our dialog from [2] to [3]. Please lets discuss there. Thanks. - BTW: I have answered there. -- User tsor
Transparency and figures merging
[edit]Hi, I ask you about this technical question because you are much more advanced in this than me.
Is possible to make a template able to merge two images (one or both images should be a mask with transparency features) in order to display one image?
More mad question:
Is it possible to merge a image with a table of images in order to construct masks? This is very important in chess diagrams standars and the capability to construct chess diagrams with additional graphic explanation. Reference Commons:Talk:Standard chess diagram - supplement#Technical solution to be researched Thanks. --GengisKanhg (my talk) 19:10, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
- Yes, it is possible. See Vail, Colorado for an example. It should be easy to modify the template that page uses for chess boards. dbenbenn | talk 21:06, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
Hello Gengiskanhg this message is a invitation to categorize your userpage in the category: Category:Wikipedians of Mexico or in the adecuate sub-category and erasing your name from the equivalent list since the lists of users are in process of being transformed into categories. Remember: You can categorize your user page in more than one category. example: your actual location and your origin country.
for more info see: Wikipedia:User categorisation and Category:Wikipedians by location
Saludos. --Mnts 03:16, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
Universidades y Colegios
[edit]I would like to invite you to check out the userboxes that I have created in Wikipedia! If your Collge/University is not there feel free to make create one or let me known and I'll make it (User: Lufthmark)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Userboxes/Education/Mexico
Resources for photographers
[edit]Hi Gengiskanhg,
Good to see another phtographer joining the force! With respect to image resources on the web, I'm afraid my knowledge of them isn't quite as good as it could be - I'm pretty much a photoshop man relying on it for my image editing. With respect to the Image:Female Emperor Gum Moth.jpg, the white bg was achieved using photoshop. First you make a second layer which is the color you want the background (in this case white). Sit that layer underneath the layer which has your original pic, and then carefully at about 300% magnification erase the existing background around the subject. The white layer will become visible through this. This method obviously takes a long time, but has the benefit of the option to change color of bg at will. There is an "easier" way, but it requires a background of the color you choose. For instance these photos: Image:Bananas white background.jpg, Image:Onions.jpg, Image:Raspberries02.jpg were taken on a white painting canvase (canvas is good because you don't get reflections). The benefit of this besides the quickness is that you get a realistic shadow. There is a third option for doing this, but you probably wont be able to achieve it with your camera. You need to shoot your flash from a close distance onto your subject. But the important part is that you have to set your shutter speed/aperture to a high value. The light from the flash will quickly disperse and due to the high shutter speed the background without the benefit of the flash will become v. dark through black. See this photo for an example: Image:Day old chick black background.jpg.
Back to your original question, I can't offer more than going to download.com and check out what they have. Most of it is shareware but some is freeware. Hope this helps somewhat. If you need more help I'd suggest contacting Solipsist or Diliff. --Fir0002 www 22:56, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
None
[edit]Hmm, you're the guy from instantchess.com, aren't you? Introgressive 18:55, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
chess
[edit]Hi, you posted sometime in 2005 on the latin wikipedia about the new chess template. I just wanted to thank you, we have finally stumbled upon your message!!!--Ioshus(talk) 18:52, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Gengiskanhg. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Gengiskanhg. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Original Barnstar | |
Ernst Kussul is a very good page. Well done! Nocturnal781 (talk) 05:16, 8 March 2023 (UTC) |