Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cliff Condak
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. I will also speedy related articles that have the same content. —Xezbeth 08:00, May 15, 2005 (UTC)
you guessed it - "...is an illustrator." This is getting out of hand. 82 google hits. Grutness|hello? 
01:29, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy, very short article with no context. —Korath (Talk) 03:01, May 9, 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy, Korath is correct. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 03:22, May 9, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, not notable, micro stub. Megan1967 05:03, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. not enough to even verify the existence of the articles subject. --Allen3 talk 17:34, May 9, 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy — Sebastian (talk) 00:41, 2005 May 10 (UTC)
- delete nn - but is someone going to nominate the dozens of other similar articles created by the same person??--Doc Glasgow 08:16, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Inclined to agree that this is a speedy delete, articles case #1. Maybe let this one go through VfD now it's this far, but the others could just disappear. Andrewa 06:49, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Looks like a speedy. Jayjg (talk) 22:53, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.