User talk:Distantbody

Welcome to the Wikipedia

Here are some links I thought useful:

Wikipedia:Tutorial

Sam Spade (talk · contribs) 15:29, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)

I had to roll back your edit at Left-wing politics because you had inserted a copy of the article into itself. If you also made a substantive edit, I couldn't find it and have inadvertantly reverted it, so you might want to revisit that article. -- Jmabel | Talk 18:27, Jan 30, 2005 (UTC)

Image:Millau Bridge over Tarn River France.jpg

Hi Distantbody,

That's a nice picture of the Millau Viaduct. Can you be sure to add an appropriate copyright tag and any source information that you have. Thanks. -- Solipsist 12:26, 6 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

i have added file info as your request. We all get a bit lazy now and then dont we ;)

Thanks, that looks good. Shame its a FairUse image, as that means I can't nominate it for WP:FPC. Nevertheless its good to have the tags in place. -- Solipsist 08:31, 7 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Adding the tag does not make it usable in WP. You need to cite the source's permission to use the image. Use of the fair use tag may be more limited than you think. Note that you did not properly reference the source, which was not the blogspot - that only referenced the original which is in a library deeply embeded within the site (http://www.athenaamerica.com/) and for which I have not been able to find a link path to from the home page. You need to contact AthenaAmerica to find out more. For now, I have noted the possible copyright violation (but not tagged it as such). Please follow up on this. Thanks, and best wishes. Leonard G. 14:43, 14 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant links

I see you've removed some links to dates in Crew Exploration Vehicle. We link these dates not so much so the date article can be clicked on, but because this allows Wikipedia to display the date according to local preference. Some people find that a date of 'December 9' looks natural, others prefer '9 December'. If we link 9 December and December 9 (look at the wiki code for these to see the difference), you see what your preferences ask for.-gadfium 08:48, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Oceanxx.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Oceanxx.jpg. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag, so its copyright status is therefore unclear. Please add a tag to let us know its copyright status. (If you created/took the picture then you can use {{gfdl}} to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use {{fairuse}}.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know on the image description page where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Otherwise, see Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. Thanks so much. --Secret london 16:49, 23 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging (yet again...)

Hi can you please add the image copyright tag for Image:Yellow OLED.jpg and Image:A good example of the flexability of OLEDs.gif. I've added no source tag to them but I need to know its copyright status because I would like to use one of them. Thanks alot --antilived 06:31, 27 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Hot Dry Rock Diagram.gif

moved this comment from your user page --D e ath phoenix 15:42, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Er, Hi! Just wondered if you had any licensing information for Image:Hot Dry Rock Diagram.gif? Was it a diagram you produced yourself, or did you get it from the web? CharlesC 00:03, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Quasar

Hi Distantbody,

I just wanted to let you know why I removed your theory of the formation of quasars. This theory has yet to see publication in a peer-reviewed document, and since original research is not allowed, I have removed your theory. Please see Talk:Quasar#Reverting supermassive black hole theory for more details. Thanks, D e ath phoenix 15:41, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

ITER

i see your point, infomation repeated form other articles is somewhat redundant. however, i never intended to preach the complex workings of a fusion reactor. i feel what i added is a brief summary of that, aimed at users without an in-depth technical understanding of fusion power. please edit away; it is far from perfect, but please dont remove most of what i put.

the reason i added what i did is because before i began, almost all of the article concerned the political impact of the experiment, and very little of what it actually is supposed to do, and how it does it. it is an experiment in physics, not politics.

on another note, i am a bit rubbish with copyrights. could you please help me verify that i have not broken the law in uploading this picture from this site.

thanks, mastodon 20:32, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

please stop removing the reaction workings from the article, no one is thanking you for it. just because you say it is, doesnt mean it is irrelivant. if two seperate users had not reverted you edits so quickly, i would have done it myself. it is not a full explaination of fusion power, it is a summary for those of us who have not yet memorised wikipedia, which would be oh, ALL of us. i wrote it to try to thin out the politics in the article. thankyou kindly. mastodon 20:13, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

why not dig your teeth into the Joint European Torus article? its the same thing as ITER, just smaller so receives less press. mastodon 20:15, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Qtv2-SCAnim2.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Qtv2-SCAnim2.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 11:09, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:REACTOR2E.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:REACTOR2E.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --– Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 00:29, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:40 in oled samsung.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:40 in oled samsung.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:39, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:OpenBVE icon 128px.png

File:OpenBVE icon 128px.png is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Icon 128.png. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Icon 128.png]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 11:52, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:OpenBVE v1 Screenshot 3.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:OpenBVE v1 Screenshot 3.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:05, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:OpenBVE v1 Screenshot 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:OpenBVE v1 Screenshot 2.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:06, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:OpenBVE v1 Screenshot 1.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:OpenBVE v1 Screenshot 1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:10, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Palm Island Overview.PNG

Thank you for uploading File:Palm Island Overview.PNG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Killiondude (talk) 06:27, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of OpenBVE for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article OpenBVE is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OpenBVE (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Biker Biker (talk) 06:10, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:OpenBVE v1.0 screenshot.PNG

Thanks for uploading File:OpenBVE v1.0 screenshot.PNG, which you've attributed to openBVE. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --TheImaCow (talk) 09:06, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]