Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Effective Sensory Projection
A break out from Silva Mind Control that is not famous in its own right and only multiplies the number of hits Silva is going to get. Geogre 14:04, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Keep, but NPOVify and merge/redirect to Silva Mind Control. Possible that somebody could search for this, and Wikipedia should drop them off at the right place. — Gwalla | Talk 17:02, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Merge & redirect. SWAdair | Talk 04:51, 18 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- I think the whole thing should be deleted, not just this article but the Silva Mind Control article. The creators is posting a lot more of this stuff which doesn't seem to be encyclopedic. Also, this article has been listed on VfD since August 17th, but there was never a vfd header put on it. I've included it. RickK 23:20, Aug 22, 2004 (UTC)
- Keep . Useful reference for those who want to know what Silva M.C. is all about.--Jondel 00:15, 23 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Comment: RickK is right: Almost every day, another doctrine/belief of Silva Mind Control shows up as a new article. Given how consistently this is happening, my suspicion is that this is page rank boosting. If each and every word that Silva wrote gets an article, the links are going to be enormous. I redirect where I see them, but VfD would be gaining an entry a day if each were listed here. Geogre 01:31, 23 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Where? I don't see the other doctrines and beliefs as of Aug. 23. There is only one link at the [See also] section both in the Article and the Silva Mind Control. Pls go ahead and redirect. If there are too many articles, why not summarize and merge? Pls remove advertisements/(rank boosting)sections. Pls follow follow policy and be Neutral. --Jondel 03:06, 23 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Well, there's José Silva, Psychorientology, Silva Mind Control ... RickK 04:48, Aug 23, 2004 (UTC)
- Where? I don't see the other doctrines and beliefs as of Aug. 23. There is only one link at the [See also] section both in the Article and the Silva Mind Control. Pls go ahead and redirect. If there are too many articles, why not summarize and merge? Pls remove advertisements/(rank boosting)sections. Pls follow follow policy and be Neutral. --Jondel 03:06, 23 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Also, Jondel, the point is that these individual doctrines and ideas should be discussed in one place. Let Silva Mind Control grow, if all these things are vital information. Otherwise, it looks very much like the idea is to have as many individual articles as possible, therefore as many links as possible, therefore as much Google height as possible. If you look at the web, you see that the Silva Mind Control people are quite adept at using the medium. They don't have one site: they appear to have one site with presences in four or so iterations. I think redirects are the answer, if these are vital doctrines and outright deletion is the best way with most of them. Why can't the authors add to the existing (very short) Silva page? How illogical is it not to have more than a skeleton there? Geogre 17:37, 23 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Hi. I think everyone is agreeable then to merge all this (doctrines ) in one place(Silva M.C. -let it grow)? It is absolutely fine with me to redirect this page to Silva Mind Control and place the Eff. Sensory Proj. in a section there, reduce Google hits, etc.. If so, I can do it in with in this week (allow some time for responce, agreement, violent objections, whatever :) ) --Jondel 01:40, 24 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Comment: RickK is right: Almost every day, another doctrine/belief of Silva Mind Control shows up as a new article. Given how consistently this is happening, my suspicion is that this is page rank boosting. If each and every word that Silva wrote gets an article, the links are going to be enormous. I redirect where I see them, but VfD would be gaining an entry a day if each were listed here. Geogre 01:31, 23 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Completed Merge with S.M.C.--Jondel 23:14, 26 Aug 2004 (UTC)