Talk:Silicon Graphics
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Merge articles
[edit]Having two separate articles Silicon Graphics and Silicon Graphics International is inconsistent with how Wikipedia handles other similar situations. For example, there is only one Honeywell article, which covers both the original Honeywell and the Honeywell after it was acquired by Allied Signal (which took the Honeywell name, just as Rackable took the SGI name). Westwind273 (talk) 00:27, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- I have no idea if this is supposed to be the case. However, I would be certain that both the original Silicon Graphics and the Rackable-related Silicon Graphics International company should be covered in Silicon Graphics, while both articles should exist. My response is late, I know. VO/odood 14:59, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class California articles
- Low-importance California articles
- C-Class San Francisco Bay Area articles
- High-importance San Francisco Bay Area articles
- San Francisco Bay Area task force articles
- WikiProject California articles
- C-Class company articles
- Mid-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- C-Class Computing articles
- Low-importance Computing articles
- C-Class Computer hardware articles
- Mid-importance Computer hardware articles
- C-Class Computer hardware articles of Mid-importance
- All Computing articles
- C-Class Technology articles
- WikiProject Technology articles