Jump to content

User talk:MDCore

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

oi :)

Hi, likewise. We need as many South Africans as possible on this place to ensure our lovely country doesn't get under-represented or worse, misrepresented. One extreme example is how the article on Apartheid became another Israel-Palestine conflict page, virtually ignoring what Apartheid really was, a South African system, and part of our history.
So, yep, it's great to see another South African on Wikipedia! Impi 19:25, 23 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Hi MD, good to meet you. Thanks for your message on my talk page. I guess it doesn't matter too much what message gets used... we seem to managed to get a nice little article started between us and particular Stan. Hope to see you around in the future! Pcb21| Pete 23:26, 26 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Clock towers and the Clock Tower

[edit]

As there are no clock towers called the Clock Tower that I know of (or probably at all), there is no need to move Clock Tower to Clock Tower (Westminster). ed g2stalk 00:27, 28 Jul 2004 (UTC)

I agree the case sensitive of wikipedia is a bit odd, I've added disambiguation link to the top of Clock Tower which I think was needed. ed g2stalk 16:42, 28 Jul 2004 (UTC)


World Radio Geneva

[edit]

159753: I have got the infomation from WRG's web-site so they are likely to make non neutral. Sorry about this. Feel free to alter this.

Birmingham

[edit]

You might like to check out the current vote at Talk:The Lord of the Rings
along with some of the discussion at
Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion#Category:Literature_from_Birmingham.2C_England
Category_talk:Birmingham,_England
-- Solipsist 09:43, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Thanks

[edit]

Nice comments for what I thought was slightly rant-tastic! PMcM 16:15, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)

The Humungous Image Tagging Project

[edit]

Hi. You've helped with the Wikipedia:WikiProject Wiki Syntax, so I thought it worth alerting you to the latest and greatest of Wikipedia fixing project, User:Yann/Untagged Images, which is seeking to put copyright tags on all of the untagged images. There are probably, oh, thirty thousand or so to do (he said, reaching into the air for a large figure). But hey: they're images ... you'll get to see lots of random pretty pictures. That must be better than looking for at at and the the, non? You know you'll love it. best wishes --Tagishsimon (talk)

Thanks for your tip on the Olympia Oyster - see Talk:Emeryville, California, and look at the article to see how it was handled Leonard G. 06:18, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Cities and towns

[edit]

Hi MDCore, The suburbs that you are refering to used to be towns but are now part of the Cape Metro. If they were always suburbs of Cape Town please let me know or change them as I've only been to Cape Town twice in my lifetime, hopefully I can visit again soon :-). I only did the list last night and need to still go trough some of the links that are not appropriate. If you want you can fix them, thanks for the heads up.

Anyway why don't you put your username on a list of South African Wikipedians at Wikipedia:Wikipedians/South Africa --Jcw69 12:56, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)

suburbs

[edit]

Hi, I am a new Capetonian wikipedian, and am busy writing articles for Cape Town's suburbs, so far I ve written one on Bergvliet and Tokai. Is there a chance that you could help me out please? Thanks. Banes 15:44, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

[edit]

Thanks for the nice comment on my talk page! I've only just started redoing the UCT article; I'm planning to get it into the structure at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Universities, although that is sometimes a bit USA-specific. - htonl 15:30, 22 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimania 2008 in Cape Town

[edit]

Hi. Would you be interested in helping to ensure Wikimania 2008 is held in Cape Town? If so, please go to the Cape Town bid page, and sign up on the discussion page. Feel free to dive right in with adding suggestions, or fleshing out the bid! I'd greatly appreciate any help, no matter how small. Greenman 23:59, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

South African Wikimedia Chapter

[edit]

The idea of setting up a local Wikimedia chapter has been discussed by South African Wikipedians (and those associated with other Wikimedia projects) for some time now, and we want to help turn this dream into a reality. There are currently over 25 chapters established around the world, and several more planned and being discussed, but so far, none in Africa. A South African chapter, should it become a reality, would be a continental first. If you're interested in being involved in the creation of a South African Wikimedia Chapter, could you please email me directly at wikipedia@africancommons.org. Kaydee 68 13.53, 08 June 2010 (UTC)

South African Wikimedia Chapter update and mailing list

[edit]

Hi there. Local Wikipedians have set up a mailing list where we will be discussing the formation of a local Wikimedia Chapter in South Africa. Please join the mailing list at this url https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaza. There is also a page set up on Meta where you can add your name if you're interested to take this idea forward. Check out http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_South_Africa. Thanks Kaydee 68 (talk) 09:05, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

[edit]

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:22, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Call for Wikipedians in Residence in Africa

[edit]

Hello,

I hope you are well and thriving!! WikiAfrica has just put out a call for two Wikipedians in Residence. One in Cape Town at WikiAfrica, at the Africa Centre; and the other for WikiAfrica Cameroon in Douala, at doual’art. If you are interested, please contact either Marilyn [marilyn.doualabell@doualart.org] for the WikiAfrica Cameroon call or Isla [islahf@africacentre.net] for the WikiAfrica position in Cape Town.

If you are not interested in applying, I would be very grateful if you could spread this call far and wide among your networks to ensure that both projects get excellent candidates. Here is the link for the information page: http://www.wikiafrica.net/two-wikipedians-in-residence-for-africa/

Best regards, Islahaddow

(This message was sent using Lucia Bot at 22:27, 16 November 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, MDCore. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, MDCore. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, MDCore. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, MDCore. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]