User talk:MyNameIsNeo7

Internet Relay Chat edit

Regarding your edit, changing X11 to X Windows, I would advise you to take a look at X Windowing System, specifically, section 9 on Nomenclature. The term "X Windows" (in the manner of "Microsoft Windows") is officially deprecated and generally considered incorrect. I have taken the liberty of correcting the mistake (although your other edits I agree with). --huwr 04:37, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[I have edited my original comment out -- it was a bit too extreme] Nbougalis 14:05, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Origin of Lunar Linux

I must disagree with lunar not having an origin because it is based on another distribution. Many other distributions are based on other distributions, such as Ubuntu, Knoppix, and CentOS. The project started in the US, thus to me, that's where Lunar's origin is, and I'm sure this is how many other distribution's origins are figured. If the origin column were so specific to only be for distributions not based on others, it would become quite useless just because so many distributions are forks of other distributions. That of course, is just my opinion, and being a lunar developer myself I'm sure I'm a bit biased, but if it is to be enforced on lunar, it should be enforced on all forks. -- Striker 22:28, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

"If the origin column were so specific to only be for distributions not based on others, it would become quite useless just because so many distributions are forks of other distributions."

That's what the "Predecessor" column is for.

If you can confirm that every developer for Sorcerer GNU/Linux and the developers that initially forked it into Lunar Linux were all located in the USA, then it's fine to list Lunar's origin as "USA". Otherwise it is illogical.

Alternatively, we could say Lunar's origin is "Forked from Sorcerer" or just "Sorcerer"; Sorcerer is already listed as its "Predecessor", however, so this would seem redundant to me. ¦ Reisio 22:53, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see how debating where all the project's developers were from counts for anything. That can be stated for any distribution as well...I would imagine hardly any distributions have one single location for its developers, not to mention that other distributions based on a previous one will be from the same location. Ubuntu is a fine example of this, since it's based on debian which has developers world-wide. Lunar was forked by Chuck Mead under his new project based in the US, on US servers, thus the origin is the US. -- Striker 23:32, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

If Mead forked it all by himself with assistance from nobody else (or if everyone helping was also from the USA), I've no problem with its origin being "USA". ¦ Reisio 00:16, 27 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Let's keep this simple. Comparison tables don't provide enough room for nuances and subtlety. If the lead developer was based in the US at the time the distribution was forked, then that's the origin. Many of the distributions have an international development team, but there's simply not enough space in the comparison table to explain this. That's what the individual articles about each distribution are for. --MarkSweep✍ 02:14, 27 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you enforcing this only on the Lunar Linux project, and not all the other distributions listed? Can I not also ask where exactly every developer for a particular distribution was from and find out that some developers lived abroad in other countries? I fail to see the point in your argument that all developers from one line of distributions must all live in one location for it to count as an origin. Everything has an origin, even if it's based on prior work and not all developers lived in the same location. -- Striker 00:33, 27 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I fail to see the point in your argument

I noticed. :) Don't worry about it; if majority consensus is for "USA", that's what it shall be. ¦ Reisio 02:45, 27 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

lol you think?

I reverted that anon at Star Wars Galaxies the first time he put it in last night, and went to bed... looks like he put it right back in. I'd like to see his justification for how its not POV. :) --Syrthiss 17:12, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Bleh. Between SWG and RuneScape its a wonder we get anything done here. --Syrthiss 17:28, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Chuck Mead.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Chuck Mead.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chowbok ☠ 04:27, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 21:25, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Usurpation

Hello, Striker. A request has been made at Wikipedia:Changing username/Usurpations to usurp, or "take over", your username because another user would like to use it to edit. The changing username guideline allows a username that is not being actively used to be usurped if the user is given an opportunity to object and does not do so.

If you have an email set in your preferences, you should be getting an email from a bureaucrat or changing username clerk explaining how to consent or object to this process.

If you do not object to being renamed to a new username in order for another user to use the name you currently have, please log in and post a reply here saying so (you may also tell us what username you would like to be renamed to, or we will provide you with a generic one).

If you do nothing: the request may be filled shortly, and your account will be moved to a generic username. You may request that it be moved to a new username of your choice at any time.

If you object to being renamed: please log in and make an edit to this page clearly stating that you object to usurpation.

Please note that even if your current username is usurped, you can still edit and your data will not be lost; your preferences, watchlist, and other user settings will be transferred to a new username.

Thank you for your time. 177.18.118.123 (talk) 05:16, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Username issue

Hello Striker! Unfortunately we have an issue regarding the username. I've registered myself as Striker at the Portuguese Wiktionary on February 2010. At that time, I didn't know that there were other people using the same name on other projects. They have not claimed for an unified login and the system let me register. I did found it out a while later, but it is very workful for me to just move to another name. The actual policy estabilishes that stewards can not perform renames under wikis that have active bureaucrats, which many do. I would need to come to more than 70 wikis to request it, not counting the projects where I have not edited and where I'll not even request the renaming, otherwize I'd need to request under 200+ wikis. All that because (1) I created the global Striker account; (2) I have joined SWMT and became way active in it for a while, reverting vandalism on many projects.

I recognize and respect the right you have of keeping your username. Notwithstanding I regret to say that you'll not be able to do cross-wiki work if you decide do do so, not because I don't want you to, but because there are other Strikers besides me. I am trying to usurp those accounts, but there are no guaranties, especially for he:User:Striker. In addition to that, a cluster of new Striker accounts, which belong to me nowadays, will not be renamed and will be left behind in the renaming process as they have zero edits, not being worth for me to spend time writing renaming requests. I wonder if something like global renaming existed. I'd just rename my global account and you'd not be bothered nor the other Strikers.

I would like to hear from you if you intend to raise your username or let me usurp it, so I can decide wether to start the long and workful renaming process or continue the ongoing usurpation requests. My interest is to contribute under many wikis and to help with the war against vandalism, mainly on small wikis and perhaps become a steward, who knows... For that, I need to have a full merged global account.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Best regards, Striker (from metawiki) (confirmation of this message from my homewiki).

PS: My english is far from the perfection. Sorry for any misspelling or grammatical mistake.

Update: I have usurped all the other Striker accounts except yours and the one from commons as you can see here. --Striker (metawiki) 01:36, 29 September 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 177.41.166.191 (talk) [reply]

Proposed deletion of Chuck Mead

The article Chuck Mead has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Completely unsourced BLP, I found a few minor hits online that verified that someone named Chuck Mead exists, but not that he is notable enough for an article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sudo Ghost 09:37, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Striker. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Striker~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

02:53, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

19:16, 22 April 2015 (UTC)