Portal talk:Biology
 | This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the portal about Biology.
Content dispute discussions should take place on the appropriate article's talk page. For discussions about general portal development, please see the WikiProject Portals talk page.
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4If you are a regular maintainer of this portal, please add yourself to this list. |
 |
The Biology Portal is a featured portal, which means it has been identified as one of the best portals on Wikipedia. If you see a way this portal can be updated or improved without compromising previous work, please feel free to contribute. | ||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
 | This portal does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Automated portal content suggestions () The following suggestions have been automatically generated as content that might be suitable for the portal, subject to review by a human editor. Please do not mindlessly copy items to the portal page without first checking that the suggestions are appropriate.
|
Status report from the Portals WikiProject
[edit]Wikipedia:WikiProject Portals is back!
The project was rebooted and completely overhauled on April 17th, 2018.
Its goals are to revitalize the entire portal system, make building and maintaining portals easier, and design the portals of the future.
As of April 29th, membership is at 56 editors, and growing.
There are design initiatives for revitalizing the portals system as a whole, and for each component of portals.
Tools are provided for building and maintaining portals, including automated portals that update themselves in various ways.
And, if you are bored and would like something to occupy your mind, we have a wonderful task list.
From your friendly neighborhood Portals WikiProject. — The Transhumanist 03:26, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Main Question on Biology
[edit]The main question on Biology is:
a. What is life.
b. What is to be alive.
c.
Cloud forest (talk) 19:00, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
Coatrack article
[edit]I came across the article Pyruvate cycling earlier today. The article as it stands is almost impossible for someone well versed in the area to comprehend, and it appears to simply be a WP:COATRACK for a load of papers. It doesn't seem like a legit article at this point. I'm sure the topic is legit, but the article is nowhere near Wikipedia standards. Can someone more versed in this take a look as I'll only delete all the further reading and coatrack elements. Cheers. Canterbury Tail talk 11:50, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
What species is shown ?
[edit]Extended content
|
|---|
|
|
Here What species is shown ? 2003:6:13D3:F133:615D:ED00:9E14:2CA4 (talk) 21:18, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
- This is a question better suited for the science reference desk. —andrybak (talk) 01:30, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Revitalise the biology portal?
[edit]Should we keep editing this portal? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryan busse (talk • contribs) 19:00, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
- Absolutely. See the portal's Revision history for improvements that were made today. North America1000 12:54, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
- I'm afraid it's flogging a dead horse. Websites need portals when other navigation mechanisms are lacking; but we have 1) Wikilinks 2) Main and Further links 3) See also sections 4) Navbars, navboxes 5) Categories 6) WikiProjects 7) probably several other mechanisms I've forgotten to mention. A portal basically just rehashes existing content, and if I was to be unkind I'd say "less well". We don't need'em, specially in a very well-linked area like bio. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:19, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
- While you're entitled to your opinion, many others feel differently than you do about portals. North America1000 14:39, 31 May 2021 (UTC)