Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/"Iraq Water Treatment Vulnerabilities"

Should this be moved to Wikisource? The capital letters really hurt your eyes too. --Chessphoon 02:29, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Delete. Since the whole thing is available here, I think it would be best to just delete it and put the link in the External Links section of some relevant page. Livajo 03:43, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Comment: That link doesn't work for me. Andrewa 17:49, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Non-encyclopedic report. — Gwalla | Talk 03:47, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Non-encyclopedia. --Yath 04:34, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Delete: Seems to be another voice in a political debate. Geogre 04:45, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Non-encyclopedic report / source material from 13 years ago. SWAdair | Talk 08:35, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Comment: There is interesting material here that could be useful, but agree the title is unsuitable, the facts in need of checking and the block letters painful. Unsure as to how it could be used, so no vote for the moment. Andrewa 17:45, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Delete - Tεx τ urε 17:07, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Delete: exists elswhere, Wikipedia isn't the place for it. Mackensen 05:29, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Delete but if it's authentic, it is evidence of a war crime, intentional targetting facilities essential for civilian population. What's the frequency Kenneth? Alberuni 05:34, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Delete. I can see this as an external link for any number of pages, but it's not entirely appropriate for an article by itself, under that title and with the current content. --Viriditas 05:38, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC)