Talk:Sangiovese
A fact from Sangiovese appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 January 2009, and was viewed approximately 2,200 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Made changes
[edit]Added some details, added a more recent SuperTuscan gaining steam which is 100% Sangiovese, not a blend.
Made some changes & corrections - Brunello di Montalcino is 100% Sangiovese, not a blend.- Avignonesi 09:14, 14 February 2024 (GMT+1)
A ‘slow ripening wine’
[edit]What does this mean? (I tend to think of grapes as ripening and wines as maturing.) -Ian Spackman 15:03, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
Towards GA
[edit]I think I've probably got this up to a B, at least as far as I'll be able to take it. With some pics, expansion of the viticulture section and a bit more in the Italy section and some general tidying up, it'll be a GA candidate I reckon. FlagSteward 17:11, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
- I added a picture I took last week, although the grapes are clearly not yet ripe.
- I once read (and I can't remember where) that Sangiovese was traditionally used in Italian blends because it was too ordinary with no special features or flavors, and it wasn't until it went to California that Sangiovese developed the body and flavor to distinguish itself as viable stand-alone varietal. Anyone else hear something like that? ~Amatulić (talk) 01:38, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
Lead picture
[edit]I notice User:Agne27 replaced my picture in this edit. Personally I still like mine better (sniff), because it showed the leaf shape and the purple color of the grapes better. My image is also in much better focus when you click on it to view the larger size.
Mine: Image:Sangiovese_grapes.jpg
Agne's: Image:Sangiovese close up crop.jpg
Either way is fine by me, I guess, unless there's a consensus to go back to mine. ~Amatulić (talk) 01:05, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
- I didn't replace it. I just moved it down to the USA section. There were two lines of thought at work 1.) It was the only picture relevant to American Sangiovese that could work in that area and 2.) While I agree that your picture is better focused, for the lead infobox pic I think a picture of post-veraison grape cluster is more ideal since it not only shows the coloring of the grapes more accurately but also the shape of the cluster better. AgneCheese/Wine 02:43, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
- OK. I agree with your reasoning, although I think that among the 3 pictures of grape bunches in this article, we shouldn't have a fuzzy one as the lead. Anyway, I'll be taking more pictures eventually, so we'll have a better one someday. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:10, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Name - Urban legend?
[edit]Guys, where does this "blood of Jove" story come from and why is it given here as "Thruth"? I know that it is currently quoted almost everywhere as the origin of the name, but that was completely unheard of before the 1990's! Before that it has always been explained to come from "San Giovese" (simply "holy Jupiter's [grape]"). Problem of course is that most of the online content is after that date so the earlier examples of the word origin are not easily available. In general, Italians have usually never associated wine with blood (that is more Spanish idea and of course comes from the Christianity which might explain the one stories around this crediting a priest with the name) and the word "sangue" (blood) is pronounced very differently (with ŋ) than how the grape name is pronounced (where n and g are in different syllables). Italians especially seem to be pretty much against this "blood of Jove", example e.g. here: IT Chefs Pjsinc (talk) 11:27, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
Assessment comment
[edit]The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Sangiovese/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
I've just knocked it up into rough sections and added a bit more about the wine and the vine, so it's certainly more than a Stub now (the last Top Priority Stub in the WP?), but it needs a lot more work, particularly on the Italy section, which should arguably be split into subheadings for Tuscany, Emilia-Romana etc.
Pictures of Sangiovese grapes would be good, also of vines in the vineyard. Just about all the sections could do with more work though :-) FlagSteward 00:28, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Last edited at 20:00, 25 August 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 05:25, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Sangiovese. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070807005112/http://www.winelit.slsa.sa.gov.au/grapeswines.htm to http://www.winelit.slsa.sa.gov.au/grapeswines.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070427134038/http://www.genres.de/idb/vitis/ to http://www.genres.de/idb/vitis/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:58, 4 June 2017 (UTC)