Talk:Lexden

East Anglia Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Anglia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of East Anglia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.East AngliaWikipedia:WikiProject East AngliaTemplate:WikiProject East AngliaEast Anglia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

The info added replicates that on http://www.lexden.org.uk, but I wrote that too. Angela 20:51 15 Jun 2003 (UTC)

Link to Domesday book

The link to the Domesday book entry no longer works. Can anything be done about this?

Area defined as Lexden needs clarification and what's this about Spring Lane being a modern bypass?

The Lexden village boundary would be good if anyone knows where it lies.

Also, I am confused by the statement that Lexden is cut in half by the modern bypass, Spring Lane, as Spring Lane is neither modern nor a bypass (though it could be used as one), and very narrow and winding. Would it be correct to assume that Lexden's Spring Lane is, in fact, cut in half by the modern (1930s) Colchester Bypass (aka Cymbeline Way aka Avenue of Remembrance). If so, the 'offending' sentence could be modified. 87.113.62.23 (talk) 20:50, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lexden. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:55, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]