Talk:Oxygen difluoride

Untitled

Someone made an edit to this article saying it is sometimes thought of as an oxide rather than a fluoride. How widely believed is this?? Georgia guy 22:55, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I would say that it is a legitimate edit. It is not really useful to classify it as either, but there you go, we have to call it something! Physchim62 23:37, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

density

the density is wrong is to high dens for agas drom oxygen and fluorin —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.176.97.146 (talk) 17:14, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Name

Note that it cannot be classified as an oxide because of larger electronegativity of the fluorine. However, covalent-bonded electrons are not moved to fluorine atoms almost at all, so the molecule is not polarized. But formal, it`s oxygen difluoride, not difluorine oxide. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.159.166.98 (talk) 07:18, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reactions

The given reaction equations and products in the section "reactions" are somewhat inconsistent. Is sulfur oxidized to the state +4 or +6? And why does a reaction of OF₂ with a reducing agent release elemental fluorine but reduce the oxygen? --79.243.250.21 (talk) 23:17, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

One could say that there are whiners and there are editors. Which one do you choose? Get book and look it up! --Smokefoot (talk) 01:38, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Oxygen difluoride. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060116134617/http://www.npi.gov.au/database/substance-info/profiles/44.html to http://www.npi.gov.au/database/substance-info/profiles/44.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:14, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

odorless

According to a crossword puzzle today OF2 is an odorless gas. I suppose if it completely destroys the olfactory cells before they can send out a signal, then it would be. Otherwise, I would expect it to have an odor similar to fluorine. Gah4 (talk) 05:24, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Boiling point

The article presently states that the boiling point is 228 degrees Fahrenheit, and that it's storable, which lead to its use in rocketry. I'm fairly certain that it's missing a negative sign, because; A) several chemistry websites have it listed at that, as well as Ignition!, If I remember correctly and B) It would have gotten a lot more press as a storable oxidizer if it were, even with its toxicity and the production of HF as an exhaust product. 2603:8001:2200:338E:BCDD:F4E5:FBF0:1017 (talk) 06:10, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Science Direct says -228.6. Gah4 (talk) 07:07, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]