Talk:Matewan

Chicago Low‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Appalachia Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Appalachia, a collaborative effort to increase coverage of Appalachia and the Appalachian Mountains. If you would like to participate, go to the project page to see a list of related articles needing attention.AppalachiaWikipedia:WikiProject AppalachiaTemplate:WikiProject AppalachiaAppalachia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: West Virginia B‑class Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
B	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	West Virginia portal This article is supported by WikiProject West Virginia (assessed as Low-importance).

Organized Labour B‑class Low‑importance

	Organized Labour portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles
B	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been selected for the Organized Labour Portal Article Of The Day for August 28.
	This article has been selected for the Organized Labour Portal Labour in the Media section.

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Trains Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article lacks references.

Library of Congress Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Library of Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Library of Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Library of CongressWikipedia:WikiProject Library of CongressTemplate:WikiProject Library of CongressLibrary of Congress articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

POV

POV text moved here:

Somewhat of a hallmark in films about labor history, but never widely renowned. Lee M 20:15, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Good point. However, the critics will speak about this! Best- Luigibob (talk) 10:10, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

change: gun thugs to strike breakers

I won't disagree with anyone who challenges "gun thugs" as POV.

However, replacing gun thugs with "strike breakers" is not a perfect fit, in my view. Gun thugs are indeed strike breakers, but replacement workers who may never pick up a gun are more frequently described as strike breakers. Therefore, the POV term "gun thugs" has a very clear meaning, but using "strike breakers" as a replacement confuses the issue. Richard Myers (talk) 08:24, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Silly me.

After seeing Wikipedia's "administrator" Orangemike substitute "guncarrying" (one word) for "armed" I should not have attempted to explain my objection to the use of the term "gun thug" to a dedicated member of the IWW, or anyone else. HOUNDDAWG (talk) 12:35, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A belated afterthought: There were no "unarmed strike breakers" in the film if one discounts the already labeled "scabs". (They were there primarily to work and earn money and for whom breaking the strike would have been incidental. In fact, the longer the strike lasted the longer the replacement workers-who were more frequently described as "scabs" rather than "strike breakers" would have work. The one unrecognized "agent provocateur" has already been labeled so there's no reason to confuse his character with the strike breakers, and there's no reason to refer to either by different sobriquets on the Wikipedia page.)

Neither of the aforementioned could be reasonably confused with the armed Baldwin-Felts agents I referred to as "strike breakers". Therefore, it would be difficult to "confuse the issue" of armed strike breakers with non existent people. No one was carrying a Bible, handing out leaflets or otherwise peacefully resisting the unionization or the "commie, Red, pinko takeover" of the WVA mines.

There were no "incidental unarmed strike breakers" not already accounted for (and pigeon-holed as "scabs"- in the interest of balance shouldn't pro union miners have been referred to as "mob extortionists" or worse?) in the film. And no characters (with the possible exception-and it's a stretch-of the pastor who criticized godless Bolsheviks from the pulpit) whose arguable "primary purpose" was to break the strike through peaceful means.

Also, because the striking miners, their women and the hill people in sympathy with them were also armed, reserving the term "gun thugs" for "paid anti union agents" could best be described as a knee jerk, politically correct response. I mean, "everybody knows that armed, out of work miners, presumably with pro-organized labor angels perched on their shoulders couldn't possibly be thugs, right?" — Preceding unsigned comment added by HOUNDDAWG (talk • contribs) 11:01, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Battle was not the strike

The so-called Battle of Matewan was not "a coal miners' strike", but the assassination of the private detectives who had just evicted mine company workers from their rented homes.Royalcourtier (talk) 02:42, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Matewan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120614054932/http://blairmountainmuseum.org/ to http://www.blairmountainmuseum.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:15, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]