Jump to content

Talk:Andrew Cockburn

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]
Viajero, why did you kill the publications section?  All authors have a publication/bibliography section.  user:TitaniumDreads apr 13 03:46 2005
  • also he's written several books. If anything it would make more sense to kill the first mention of "out of the ashes" since it isn't in citation form.

Irish?

[edit]

Born in Britain to British parents, but spent some of his childhood in Ireland. How does that make him Irish? 86.7.211.128 (talk) 00:17, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not the first Brit to notice that being Irish is trendier. Aussiesta (talk) 06:45, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
More seriously, I drifted here after reading the latest article he wrote for LRB, which includes some amazing assertions including that the US covertly supported the Khmer Rouge. Is there a category for deranged reviewers in Wikipedia? Should we include such things? Perhaps Mr Cockburn can show himself, under a false name, and correct the record for all time, because the Wikipedia entry for the KR includes no mention of such allegations. Aussiesta (talk) 06:50, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

O'Wikipedia can't bring itself to accept British for a nationality. Never trust wiki for a decent overview of someones heritage because it is always gonna have Irish just chucked in there somewhere despite the person in question being about as Irish as a Shaka Zulu. Nothing trendy about coming from some back water that got butt f**ked by the English for 800 years. Sorry, couldn't help myself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.147.108.222 (talk) 00:05, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

This article has been reverted by a bot to this version as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 06:26, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

This article has been reverted by a bot to this version as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 13:10, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Andrew Cockburn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:03, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bibliography

[edit]

I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section using cite templates. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. ISBNs and other persistent identifiers, where available, are commented out, but still available for reference. This is a work in progress; feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 11:30, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Andrew_Cockburn&oldid=1206732098"