Talk:Biological anthropology
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Biological anthropology article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This level-4 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Citations list useful for updating this article and related articles
[edit]You may find it helpful while reading or editing articles to look at a bibliography of Anthropology and Human Biology Citations, posted for the use of all Wikipedians who have occasion to edit articles on human genetics and related issues. I happen to have circulating access to a huge academic research library system at a university with an active research program in these issues (and to other academic libraries in the same large metropolitan area) and have been researching these issues sporadically since 1989. You are welcome to use these citations for your own research. You can help other Wikipedians by suggesting new sources through comments on that page. It will be extremely helpful for articles on human genetics to edit them according to the Wikipedia standards for reliable sources for medicine-related articles, as it is important to get these issues as well verified as possible. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 17:51, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Phrenology
[edit]I can't help feeling that Phrenology should probably be listed here - regardless of what it actually is as a discipline. Measuring the skull and expecting to find accompanying intellectual or cultural traits seems pretty linked to Physical Anthropology to me... —Brigade Piron (talk) 08:10, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Belief in a European origin of humans is "scientific racism"?
[edit]I'm pretty sure that's a big NPOV. Otherwise we should call the "out of Africa" theory scientific racism as well. Hamstergamer (talk) 20:05, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
Adding Forensic anthropology
[edit]Does anyone object to adding Forensic anthropology under branches or does anyone propose a better alternative for placement?
Anthropology has it listed under 'Key topics by field: archaeological and biological' so I feel like it should also be mentioned here.Kuiet (talk) 23:37, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- Go for it. Boneyard90 (talk) 05:58, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
External link
[edit]I have found a website about biological anthropology (The Society for Nordish Physical Anthropology), but I do not know whether Wikipedia will accept it. תיל"ם (talk) 14:02, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
==Wiki Education assignment: Information Literacy and Scholarly Discourse== This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 January 2022 and 21 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): TheDudeHotep (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Mollykleze.
— Assignment last updated by Mlclark1 (talk) 13:23, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- Start-Class level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in Society and social sciences
- Start-Class vital articles in Society and social sciences
- Start-Class Maps articles
- Low-importance Maps articles
- Start-Class Anthropology articles
- High-importance Anthropology articles
- Start-Class Anatomy articles
- Low-importance Anatomy articles
- Anatomy articles about the field of anatomy
- WikiProject Anatomy articles
- Start-Class Primate articles
- Low-importance Primate articles
- WikiProject Primates articles