Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anti bush

Anti bush was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE

Ad for someone's blog. --MarkSweep 09:26, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)

• Delete. Just another LiveJournal community. [[User:Livajo|Ливай | ☺]] 09:28, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Yet another website. - Andre Engels 10:19, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Just one of the many websites on the net. [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm|^(talk)]] 10:28, Dec 17, 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Spam. --Gene s 12:11, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as spam. Wyss 23:30, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Speedy delete Although I believe a lot better article can be written on the same topic (I believe 'Time magazine cover' also kind of covered it with hate him and love him), in its current form its is mere spam with little hope (if any) for cleanup Zain 10:34, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)

• Delete—Trevor Caira 02:45, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.