Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nickolaus A. Pacione
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 14:00, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Self-published author. See http://members.sitegadgets.com/darkpsyche/board/41.html. Vanity. RickK 04:44, May 5, 2005 (UTC)
- I wasn't enthusiastic about keeping this, but these 5800 hits for an uncommon name do give me pause... (No vote yet.) Samaritan 05:14, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- That's because he's a very prolific self-promoter. Most of those hits are for stories or autobiographies he's spread all over the Net. RickK 05:48, May 5, 2005 (UTC)
- Hmm: Current amazon.com sales rank 2,410,793 (and it came out recently) and generally horrible customer reviews. Now, if he were widely seen as "the Ed Wood of horror writers," as one of them marks him, we might have something, but no evidence of that. Delete. Samaritan 17:01, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- That's because he's a very prolific self-promoter. Most of those hits are for stories or autobiographies he's spread all over the Net. RickK 05:48, May 5, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, prolific self-promoter does not mean anyone cares. If he was good enough to get an article, he'd be good enough to get a book deal. Average Earthman 10:46, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Self-promotion. Unless shown notability, delete. - Mike Rosoft 10:55, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.