Talk:Antoninus Pius

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Antoninus Pius article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Classical Greece and Rome High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Military / Royalty and Nobility

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility (assessed as Low-importance).

Military history: Biography / Roman & Byzantine / Classical

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	Roman and Byzantine military history task force
	Classical warfare task force (c. 700 BC – c. 500 AD)

Roman and Byzantine emperors Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the Roman and Byzantine Emperors WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the Roman and Byzantine emperors. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Roman and Byzantine emperorsWikipedia:WikiProject Roman and Byzantine emperorsTemplate:WikiProject Roman and Byzantine emperorsRoman and Byzantine emperors articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:

July 31 to August 6, 2016 (24th)

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on February 25, 2009, February 25, 2010, February 25, 2011, February 25, 2019, and February 25, 2021.

Life-Long Reign

Interesting chap. According to the side-bar, he died on March 7 and continued reigning until July 10. BenedictX 23:59, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Era style

Out of respect for the Nerva-Antonine Dynasty, it would be preferred that "BCE" and "CE" be used instead of "BC" and "AD" since these people had no affiliation, or liking to Christianity. If you object, please provide a valid reason as to why. Lupus Bellator (talk) 20:59, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Personal preference isn't a sufficient reason to change from one convention to the other, per WP:ERA.Cúchullain ^t/c 19:30, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose changing era style, or removing era designation per Plotinus example at WP:ERA. Cynwolfe (talk) 22:00, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Antoninus Pius

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Antoninus Pius's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Birley, Marcus Aurelius, 114":

From Marcus Aurelius: Birley, 114.
From Early life and career of Marcus Aurelius: Birley, Marcus Aurelius, 114.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:15, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Persecution tradition

@Paraskevapius, the primary concern among myself and other editors is the present lack of reliable sourcing for your addition: with religious affairs equally as much as any other subject, a site directly affiliated with an official body representing something is not a good source for claims like this, as it is too close to the subject. We prefer secondary, scholarly sources that document these church traditions. Remsense诉 21:51, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I also understand that you are new, but generally when material is under dispute, its removal is sustained until editors work together on consensus for if and how it can be added to the article. Remsense诉 21:52, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Remsense: I've removed the section again. It's an obvious legend that has no place in a serious historical article. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 09:31, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not even a well-known story about the emperor, just a random tale essentially, one of many martyrological legends, whose historical value is typically highly dubious. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 09:37, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]