Talk:Juicy Juice

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Brands Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This is advertising...

Most likely, yes. But that doesn't keep anyone from making more informative entries. As far as I can tell, none of the statements on the page are false, just overzealous. - Quinine 00:03, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possible tampering and vandelization

I'm just another anonymous user, but I spotted this on the article "Juicy Juice Cherry tastes like motor oil." 12:00pm, Sunday, 14th of May, 2006

You are free to edit that, but I'll do it right now. Rlevse 11:56, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Direct Copy from Site?

This page appears to be a direct copy from sections of Juicy Juice's home page [[1]]. Isn't this a copyright issue? Seems too much to be fair use? Am I wrong? --Benabik 05:09, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are absolutely correct, and I've removed the offending material. Now, how on Earth did this page end up on my watchlist? ~CS 05:43, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bias

This article seems biased. I just made some changes, but I think it may still need to be cleaned up

75.182.106.197 21:49, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Something what needs to be mentioned

They may be 100 percent juice, but not the juice you're expecting to get. It's all apple, grape, and pear, because those are cheap. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.122.63.142 (talk) 16:06, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Right. I added that to the article. Also, I just tasted the cherry, and it tastes like apple - because it is apple. Grundle2600 (talk) 19:10, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This information was removed at some point. I'll try to find some sources. Just tasting like apple is not really a source, clearly original research. Fred Talk 21:46, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The ingredients label should count as a reliable source. Lngt1124 (talk) 23:35, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The label is a reliable source for what is in the bottle, the copyright date of their logo, the location of the bottling plant, the volume of juice in the bottle, etc. The question is why we would include any of this trivial material. To mention which juices there are more of than which others, we need a reliable secondary source. Otherwise, this is trivial information. If it "should be mentioned", clearly a reliable source will have mentioned this. - SummerPhD (talk) 02:43, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Juicy Juice. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100824210118/http://www.foodbev.com/article/nestle-uses-live-tweets-in-ad-campaign to http://www.foodbev.com/article/nestle-uses-live-tweets-in-ad-campaign

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:15, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]