Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Buckingham Palace/Archive 2
Well, since 1755 Lisbon earthquake seems so well-received, I'll try another renomination. This looks good to me, and all objections in the previous nomination (here) seem to be addressed. This is very little to do with me - mostly User:Giano. -- ALoan (Talk) 10:32, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Support Well put together and informative article. Filiocht | Talk 11:10, Mar 30, 2005 (UTC)
- Object - Inadequate wikipedia:lead section for an article this size. Please expand. --mav 13:36, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Object. Still full of weasel words: "it is perhaps surprising"; "thought to have been designed"; "This may indicate". Also not NPOV: there appears to be no mention of the view, held by anyone with taste, that it is the ugliest building in London. Mark1 06:21, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)