User talk:Sendai2ci

"Decolonizing"

This is English Wikipedia. The food is spelled, in reality, by real English speakers, "chicken Kiev". That says nothing about politics. We also have the food "Peking duck", even though the city is called "Beijing" today. Do not mix up politics in food articles. Equinox ◑ 06:32, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and they should be changed too. Food is politics, life is politics, to ignore that is to support the status quo, and the maintenance of colonialist and imperialist attitudes. sendai (talk) 06:38, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What about renaming "Persian cat" to "Iranian cat"? Sounds as wonderful idea for great War on Imperialism, am I right? Arado Ar 196 (talk) 06:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Chicken Kiev. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 19:19, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Chicken Kiev shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Acroterion (talk) 19:20, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]