Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Tiananmen Square protests of 1989/archive1

Created FAC from original nomination here.

A lengthy, NPOV and well-written article on a controversial issue. Ambivalenthysteria 07:34, 9 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Need to be wikified. Colipon 16:50, 9 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- Agreed. Otherwise good. Fredrik 17:33, 9 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  - Can you give me an example of where this needs to happen? I didn't write the article, but if you can point me in the right direction, I'll fix it up anyway. Ambivalenthysteria 06:54, 11 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- I don't see how it needs to be wikified. there are enough links. --Jia ng 09:19, 13 Mar 2004 (UTC)
A few sections would also be nice. --mav 06:25, 10 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Good, but I agree sections would help. Markalexander100 08:02, 14 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Looks good now. Markalexander100 08:23, 15 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Agreed. The article should be fine now. ⇒ whkoh [talk][[]] 10:33, Mar 16, 2004 (UTC)

Would there be any objections to moving this back to nominations without objections then? Ambivalenthysteria 12:31, 17 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- Support; simple, lovely example of a good feature. No objections to moving it, as the objections have been addressed. I'll move it in a minute, when I move a few others. +sj + 01:39, 2004 Mar 28 (UTC)
support. --Jia ng 19:39, 31 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Abstain. Some anti-CPC biases slip in, student protestors are romanticized periodically, etc. But still, one would expect the biases to be far more overt on WP, given the subject matter. 172 23:18, 3 Apr 2004 (UTC)