Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Concurring opinion

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was KEEP. Golbez 17:15, May 18, 2005 (UTC)

Concurring opinion

Dictionary definition. Already transwikied to wiktionary. Physchim62 17:37, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, appears to be a notable legal concept. Kappa 17:53, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. A classic stub. As it stands, its a lame dicdef, but there's a lot of encyclopedic material on the subject. ---Isaac R 18:42, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and expand. Legal topic with potential for expansion.Capitalistroadster 01:01, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep notable legal term. Klonimus 20:24, 16 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.