Talk:Medicine Lake Volcano

Volcanoes High‑importance

	Volcanoes portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Mountains Mid‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Status

Is Medicine Lake Volcano an active, dormant, or extinct? --The High Fin Sperm Whale (talk) 04:57, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is consider to be potentially active. --Burntnickel (talk) 20:53, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't potentially active just a synonym for dormant? --The High Fin Sperm Whale (talk) 01:10, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I believe it is really a matter of whose terminology you use. The issue with dormant is that the term is not well defined. --Burntnickel (talk) 00:33, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]