Talk:Austen Chamberlain

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Austen Chamberlain article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Politics of the United Kingdom Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Conservatism

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Philately Low‑importance

	Philately portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philately, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of philately and stamp collecting on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhilatelyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilatelyTemplate:WikiProject PhilatelyPhilately articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Should "KG" be put after his name in the first para since he was a Knight of the Garter, a significant honour? Rlquall 03:27, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)

There is nothing much about his father, in particular his name and a possibly more famous policitcian, or the tragic circumstances of his birth.Bedwasboy (talk) 17:49, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Austen Chamberlain did not lead the Conservative Party into an election

I recently made an addition here that Austen Chamberlain was the only Conservative Party leader not to have led the party into an election until Iain Duncan Smith. This got removed but I have now put back in because it is a very significant fact that a major party leader was not able to last long enough to present his party's case to the people. It is rather surprising that no one seems to have noticed this particular fact before. Matthew See (talk) 20:55, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's not true, though - Austen's brother Neville Chamberlain also didn't lead his party into an election. john k (talk) 22:39, 22 May 2010 (UTC) I stand corrected as I did not realise that there was a long gap in elections between 1935 and 1945.Matthew See (talk) 23:58, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Austen Chamberlain - Punch cartoon - Project Gutenberg etext 16509.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Austen Chamberlain - Punch cartoon - Project Gutenberg etext 16509.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations

What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Austen Chamberlain - Punch cartoon - Project Gutenberg etext 16509.png)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 01:02, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Family?

'Chamberlain had a wife and three children.' Did they not have names? Any notable descendants? Valetude (talk) 15:10, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Non-sequitur

Austen was dominated by his elder sister and was therefore sent away to be educated first at Rugby School...

'Therefore'? Valetude (talk) 19:30, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The ODNB article used as a reference for that says "Beatrice had a strong personality, too strong for Austen who was sent to Rugby to release him from her thrall", I have added a quote from that to the article. DuncanHill (talk) 20:38, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Father

"Brought up to be the political heir of his father, whom he physically resembled, he was elected to Parliament..." It's true that Austen and Joseph did look almost exactly the same, but this seems rather irrelevant, at least in this context. Many sons physically resemble their fathers.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.99.126.230 (talk) 03:31, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It was a deliberate action on his part. One of his sons did the same thing. Arglebargle79 (talk) 11:59, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. Austen deliberately imitated his father's distinctive appearance (monocle, orchid, etc) - in both cases was part of their political shtick, as we would nowadays say. Front-rank politicians often have their stage props (or, if they don't, are given them by cartoonists) in the same way that comedians and TV presenters have catchphrases.Paulturtle (talk) 23:20, 17 December 2021 (UTC) According to the Dutton biog (interview with his daughter, who was still alive in the mid 1980s) he had very poor eyesight, exacerbated by a teenage raquetball injury in the left eye, and sometimes literally did not recognise people. A photo in that book shows him wearing spectacles to sign the Locarno Treaty. So his monocle was very much a public stage prop, worn to imitate his father's appearance.Paulturtle (talk) 21:07, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Odd statement

I think the statement that "after the election of 1929, Chamberlain resigned his position as Foreign Secretary and went into retirement" is a bit odd as it suggested he chose to give up. The election had seen the Conservatives not only loose their majority, but finish behind Labour and Baldwin made no attempt to stay in office. Thus Chamberlain resigned in so far as the entire Government resigned. There was no prospect of him carrying on in the new Labour Government that was formed. He initially remained the Conservatives main spokesman on foreign affairs from the opposition benches. Dunarc (talk) 22:59, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]