Jump to content

Talk:Debut (Björk album)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Debut (Björk))
Good articleDebut (Björk album) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 7, 2009Good article nomineeListed

Play Dead Proposal

[edit]

"Play Dead" wasn't actually a single from Debut. You'll note it is not on the track listing. It is, in fact, the only single from the soundtrack to the film The Young Americans. I propose somebody with much better editing skills than I remove references to "Play Dead" from the main article. There's also some clean up that will need to be done in some of the related entries. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.85.100.165 (talk) 08:06, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

[edit]

I moved Debut to Debut (album) because a couple of other articles refer to the currently non-existent general article. Anyone know what a "debut" is?

WikiProject class rating

[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 15:50, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bjork, Debut album cover, 1993.jpg

[edit]

Image:Bjork, Debut album cover, 1993.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:30, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lyrics booklet

[edit]

Is it normal for the lyrics booklet for Debut to not have the lyrics for one of the songs (specifically, track 5, Like Someone In Love). My booklet skips directly from Track 4 to Track 6, so I'm missing two pages (which I assume would be one page with lyrics and the other would have a photograph). ¿Print error? ¿Normal? Help! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.18.43.69 (talk) 15:30, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rolling Stone rating

[edit]

Acclaimedmusic.net is not a notable source. At the bottom of the page, it seems that most of the information is user-submitted, which is makes it fail as a reliable source. Also, changing the rating in the ratings-box would be incorrect. The cite still says 2 out of 5. Regardless of Acclaimedmusic being used, I would rather try and find the original source in the first place. Andrzejbanas (talk) 22:31, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Rolling Stone Album Guide was released in 2004 and they revised the album rating to 3.5/5 stars. The Wikipedia page of the album guide has a link to rateyourmusic.com. This website gives you access to the entire guide. I suggest we have both the original and revised review cited and I will refer to the rateyourmusic.com website as it is the link provided on the album guide's wiki page. Spaceman Sam (talk) 02:31, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Second album ?

[edit]

This is Bjork's second studio album. She created an album in the late 70s in Iceland under this name. Please don't change it. Andrzejbanas (talk) 21:59, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Some actually think this is the third album, considering also Gling-Gló. Others think the 70s album and Gling-Gló were created under different artist alias 'Björk Guðmundsdóttir'. But let's just stick to the official album count, which doesn't include her Icelandic juvenilia and jazz releases. Officially her debut album is Debut, Post was the second in all the music press, Homogenic was the third, Vespertine was announced as fourth, Medúlla as fifth etc. This is the official numbering, let's respect it. Please see also Post album talk page. Shimenawa (talk) 11:40, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Debut (Björk album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:11, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Debut (Björk album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:24, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Debut (Björk album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:15, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Country

[edit]

@EditorE: "OK, but removing a mention Icelandic chart peak is not acceptable BECAUSE that's the country where she's from. It's common sense."

I don't understand - could you explain? Thanks. Popcornduff (talk) 16:24, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Extension of critic lists

[edit]

Like some old releases, this article have a overly rank of critic lists. Based on this consensus the number should be limited to 10. --Apoxyomenus (talk) 18:11, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Debut (Bjoerk)" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Debut (Bjoerk) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 29 § Debut (Bjoerk) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 01:32, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Debut_(Björk_album)&oldid=1211169426"