Talk:1995 in literature
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 1995 in literature article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Policy
[edit]Is there a policy on these "year in literature" pages as to which books should go on the lists? I'm not saying that this might be useful: I'd just be interested to know whether the titles mentioned so far reflect personal preferences, best seller lists, books that have been taken up into the canon, or whatever. --KF 12:09 Mar 25, 2003 (UTC)
- Yes, exactly. - DavidWBrooks 23:52, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
Categories:
- List-Class novel articles
- Mid-importance novel articles
- WikiProject Novels articles
- List-Class Book articles
- WikiProject Books articles
- List-Class Literature articles
- Low-importance Literature articles
- List-Class Years articles
- Low-importance Years articles
- List-Class Years articles of Low-importance
- List-Class List articles
- Low-importance List articles
- WikiProject Lists articles