Jump to content

Wikipedia:Collaboration of the week/Removed/2004/Archive 2

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page contains nomiations from the main Collaboration of the week page which have been removed due to lack of votes or because they're unsuitable nominations from July 1 to July 16, 2004.

Accompaniment (4 votes over 7 weeks)

[edit]

Support:

  1. Hyacinth
  2. Isomorphic
  3. Divadiane
  4. Ankur 04:56, 11 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  5. [[User:OldakQuill|Oldak Quill]] 10:21, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  6. Fredrik | talk 07:29, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Comments:

Reasons for removal:

Conceptual blending (4 votes over 7 weeks)

[edit]

Support

  1. Gyan
  2. bodnotbod 12:37, May 8, 2004 (UTC)
  3. Ankur 04:56, 11 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  4. [[User:OldakQuill|Oldak Quill]] 10:21, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Comments

  • This is an exciting and fruitful topic. It is a theory of cognition that aims to explain how humans are creative and in general how meaning is generated. I've added close to 50 links in the Talk:Conceptual_blending/Resources section. These links taken together provide enough of a definitive base to write an accurate and comprehensive encyclopedic article. -- Gyan 22:16, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)-
  • I'm calling for volunteers to help me with this article. I've setup a Draft space, for article discussion. I shall put up an outline soon to get things started. -- Gyan 22:16, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)-

Reasons for removal:

Baluchitherium (7 votes over 8 weeks)

[edit]

Support:

  1. Bensaccount 14:08, 3 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Angela. 02:20, May 4, 2004 (UTC)
  3. Fredrik 07:15, 4 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Dandrake 08:05, May 6, 2004 (UTC)
  5. Thue 23:11, 29 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
  6. [[User:OldakQuill|Oldak Quill]] 10:21, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  7. Lexor|Talk 13:40, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Comments:

Reasons for removal:

Brazilian Tapir (6 votes over 7 weeks)

[edit]

Support:

  1. 131.211.151.242 09:29, 10 May 2004 (UTC); forgot to sign in earlier: MGM 09:37, May 10, 2004 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Angela. 01:00, May 12, 2004 (UTC)
  3. RockBandit 02:09, 6 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  4. Lexor|Talk 22:56, 14 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  5. [[User:OldakQuill|Oldak Quill]] 10:21, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  6. Markalex 12:08, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Comments:

  • Very stubby, sounds like interesting animal.

Reasons for removal:

Seven-arm Octopus (10 votes over 8 weeks)

[edit]

Support:

  1. UtherSRG
  2. Robinoke 18:09, 9 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Angela. 01:00, May 12, 2004 (UTC)
  4. sunja 11:53, 28 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
  5. PlatinumX 06:28, 30 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
  6. ZaQ 23:43, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  7. [[User:OldakQuill|Oldak Quill]] 10:21, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  8. MattDal 16:15, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  9. Conti 15:31, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  10. Obli 20:55, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Comments:

  • Taxobox-only stub I created when making all of the family pages for Wikipedia:WikiProject Cephalopods. Would be a good article to get folks interested in the WikiProject, andwho can resist such an interestingly named creature! - UtherSRG
  • Google returns a very scant amount of information - this will be hard to research. On the flip side, this means that wikipedia could be the source for info on this rather interesting subject. Would be good for the "Did you know..." section of the main page. PlatinumX
  • Shouldn't that be a heptopus? Who named this thing? :-) —Ed Cormany 05:00, 2 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Reasons for removal:

  • removed due to lack of recent votes and age. Burgundavia 00:49, Jul 5, 2004 (UTC)

Comedy film (9 votes over 8 weeks)

[edit]

Support:

  1. Bodnotbod
  2. MGM 21:02, May 9, 2004 (UTC)
  3. — Adam Conover †
  4. Jwrosenzweig 17:29, 12 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Etaoin 02:33, 13 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Ankur 04:56, 11 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  7. Ambivalenthysteria 04:30, 13 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  8. JamesTeterenko 03:00, 15 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  9. Conti 23:03, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Comments:

  • This article is currently 8th on a Google search for Comedy film .
    • If that's the case we'd better make sure it's a good article. - MGM 21:02, May 9, 2004 (UTC)
  • I've laid out a skeleton to aid the efforts of a large number of editors.
  • A subject non-academics can get their teeth into. I volunteer to clear it all up if it wins. --bodnotbod 12:11, May 7, 2004 (UTC)
  • Votevotevote! — Adam Conover † 17:26, May 12, 2004 (UTC)
  • It appears Comedy film is getting some attention - it would be nice to see some commentary to go with the listings though. I find I look at it and my mind goes blank. --bodnotbod 19:59, Jun 1, 2004 (UTC)

Reasons for removal:

  • removed due to age and number of votes. Burgundavia 00:49, Jul 5, 2004 (UTC)

Journalism (3 votes over 2 weeks)

[edit]

Support:

  1. Fredrik | talk 09:49, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  2. Conti 23:11, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  3. [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 16:40, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Comments:

  • Seems like a pretty decent article already. Burgundavia 20:22, Jun 24, 2004 (UTC)
    • Well, it's decent, but it's only 5 paragraphs long. Ideally, 5 paragraphs should be the size of the summary in the lead section, not the size of the article in its entirety. Fredrik | talk 20:59, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Reasons for removal:

  • removed due to lack of votes and article size. Burgundavia 00:49, Jul 5, 2004 (UTC)

Studio (5 votes over 4 weeks)

[edit]

Support:

  1. Sarge Baldy 21:30, Jun 9, 2004 (UTC)
  2. [[User:OldakQuill|Oldak Quill]] 10:21, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  3. Conti 23:11, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  4. Fredrik | talk 21:01, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  5. Dysprosia 05:49, 3 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Comments:

  • Why isn't this an article yet? There's numerous forms of studios to explore; art, dance, movie, radio, TV. I think this could turn into something quite nice if properly executed. Sarge Baldy 21:30, Jun 9, 2004 (UTC)

Reasons for removal:

  • removed due to age and number of votes. Burgundavia 00:50, Jul 5, 2004 (UTC)

Color photography (5 votes over 3 weeks)

[edit]

Support:

  1. Etaoin 04:23, 13 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  2. Oaktree b 01:30, 14 Jun 2004 (UTC) I'd like to see this featured. Could be interesting considering how photography is evolving, going more digital these days.
  3. dpol 17:53, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  4. Conti 23:11, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  5. Jwrosenzweig 23:15, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Comments:

  • There could be a lot more on this than there is. Etaoin

Reasons for removal:

  • removed due to age and number of votes. Burgundavia 00:50, Jul 5, 2004 (UTC)

Computer network (7 votes over 3 weeks)

[edit]

Support:

  1. Fredrik (talk) 13:42, 13 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  2. Isomorphic 01:31, 14 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  3. DropDeadGorgias (talk) 22:43, Jun 14, 2004 (UTC)
  4. Burgundavia 22:38, Jun 17, 2004 (UTC)
  5. →Raul654 02:53, Jun 20, 2004 (UTC)
  6. Markalex 12:06, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  7. Jonik 18:26, 23 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Comments:

  • Currently just a list of topics. Fredrik (talk) 13:42, 13 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  • Are visio diagrams copyrighted? I could some pretty cool networking concept diagrams. DropDeadGorgias (talk) 22:43, Jun 14, 2004 (UTC)
    • The copyright of a diagram created using visio belongs to the creator (not to Microsoft). David Remahl 18:13, 20 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Reasons for removal:

  • removed due to age and number of votes. Burgundavia 00:50, Jul 5, 2004 (UTC)

Wedding traditions (6 votes over 2 weeks)

[edit]

Support:

  1. -- ALargeElk | Talk 13:11, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  2. Burgundavia 17:45, Jun 24, 2004 (UTC)
  3. Frazzydee 22:43, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  4. JamesTeterenko 05:18, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  5. ALoan (Talk) 13:10, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  6. Matthewmayer 23:45, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Comments:

  • Potentially editors all over the world can contribute on local traditions - something that a lot of people can add to without massive research. -- ALargeElk | Talk 13:11, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Reasons for removal:

  • removed due to age and number of votes. Burgundavia 00:51, Jul 5, 2004 (UTC)

Flinders Petrie (1 vote over 1 week)

[edit]

Support:

  1. Pjamescowie 09:03, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Comments:

  • Very basic information for such an influential and pioneering English archaeologist, whose techniques and methodology did so much to shape modern archaeology worldwide. Also a truly fascinating character in his own right. Pjamescowie 09:03, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)
    • Seems a decent size article already, but you never know. Burgundavia 10:11, Jun 27, 2004 (UTC)
      • Well, as an archaeologist, I do know - this short article in no way reflects the legacy of Petrie within the archaeological world..... Pjamescowie 11:27, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Reasons for removal:

  • removed due to number of votes. Burgundavia 00:52, Jul 5, 2004 (UTC)

Denim (9 votes over 4 weeks)

[edit]

Support:

  1. PlatinumX 06:42, 5 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  2. jredmond 07:22, 6 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  3. Ankur 04:56, 11 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  4. Ambivalenthysteria 04:30, 13 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  5. DropDeadGorgias (talk) 22:49, Jun 14, 2004 (UTC)
  6. Dmn 20:44, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  7. Seth Ilys 20:55, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  8. Joyous 03:31, Jun 25, 2004 (UTC)
  9. ALoan (Talk) 13:10, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Comments:

  • Denim has a well documented history, broad appeal, and a cruddy wikipedia stub.
  • Definitely. Denim jackets and jeans are iconic, and associated with several different decades in fashion. - DropDeadGorgias (talk) 22:49, Jun 14, 2004 (UTC)

Reasons for removal:

  • removed due to age. Burgundavia 00:55, Jul 5, 2004 (UTC)

Drama (13 votes over 5 weeks)

[edit]

Support:

  1. ✏ Sverdrup 23:21, 4 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  2. Fredrik (talk) 00:26, 5 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  3. Oldak Quill 10:17, 5 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  4. Sarge Baldy 20:25, Jun 8, 2004 (UTC)
  5. Ankur 04:56, 11 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  6. Etaoin 04:23, 13 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  7. Lexor|Talk 22:56, 14 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  8. Gordon 09:58, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  9. Conti 23:04, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  10. Joyous 03:30, Jun 25, 2004 (UTC)
  11. Avala 19:02, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  12. JamesTeterenko 03:02, 5 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  13. Jonik 14:30, 5 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Comments:

  • Drama seems very short to me, but it should be an overview of all the genres, the history and much more. ✏ Sverdrup
  • In what way would the proposed article differ from Theater? Maybe the effort would be better used on improving that page. Bmills 08:35, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  • Theatre encompasses the whole topic. This refers to a specific kind of theatre, the most common one. Comedy and Tragedy are also types of theatre. Burgundavia 08:39, Jun 30, 2004 (UTC)

Reasons for removal:

  • Removed due to age and lack of votes after 4 weeks. ALoan (Talk) 14:02, 6 Jul 2004 (UTC)

U.S. Army Reserve (2 votes over 1 week)

[edit]

Support:

  1. Neutrality 01:05, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  2. [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 13:00, 1 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Comments:

Reasons for removal:

  • Removed due to lack of votes after 1 week. ALoan (Talk) 14:02, 6 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Sensationalism (2 votes over 1 week)

[edit]

Support:

  1. Neutrality 01:05, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  2. Avala 12:54, 5 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Reasons for removal:

  • Removed due to lack of votes after 1 week. ALoan (Talk) 14:02, 6 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Marie Taglioni (2 votes over 1 week)

[edit]

Support:

  1. Seth Ilys 18:55, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  2. Burgundavia 19:27, Jun 29, 2004 (UTC)

Comments:

  • 19th century French ballerina generally credited with developing the style of dancing en pointe. Those topics could use articles, too. -- Seth Ilys 18:55, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)
    • While we're on the topic, ballet is pretty skimpy itself. [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 19:29, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)
      • stub now exists but needs work Ohka- 16:07, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Reasons for removal:

  • Removed due to lack of votes after 1 week. ALoan (Talk) 16:05, 7 Jul 2004 (UTC)

History of literature (3 votes over 1 week)

[edit]

Support

  1. Jwrosenzweig 23:19, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  2. [[User:Sverdrup|❝Sverdrup❞]] 13:57, 1 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  3. [[User:OldakQuill|Oldak Quill]] 15:24, 3 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Comments

  • It's a large template that is mostly not filled in. Different editors (myself included) have tried taking this article under our wing to make it fly, and found it far too vast for our knowledge to cover. It really needs many many eyes and minds to build out the various sections and make it something to be proud of. Jwrosenzweig 23:19, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  • Gracious - that is ambitious! Isn't one article going to get a bit long and unwieldy? Perhaps it would be better to have a general article, not much longer than that there already, with links to specific articles on each sub-genre? -- ALoan (Talk) 13:55, 1 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  • I don't know what to say -- we should have a 30 K article on each of the Sections there, really. [[User:Sverdrup|❝Sverdrup❞]] 13:57, 1 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  • My point, really, is that it may be more effective to concentrate on one of the sub-genres (particularly one that does not exist) rather than the whole history of literature. However, full marks for vision. -- ALoan (Talk) 10:48, 2 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  • There are already articles on Literature, Poetry, Theatre, Fiction and any number of national literatures and literary forms. I think this should be a short overview with a lot of links. Now, if anybody feels like tackling the Literature page, that's another matter. Bmills 14:23, 2 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Reasons for removal:

  • Removed due to lack of votes after 1 week. --Conti|✉ 08:32, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Dick Cheney (not a stub)

[edit]

Support

  1. Neutrality 02:19, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Comments

  • Not a stub, but... Neutrality 02:19, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)
    • This is so far from a stub that I cannot imagine why this would be nominated. Burgundavia 05:40, Jul 8, 2004 (UTC)

Reasons for removal:

  • Removed due to size of article. -- ALargeElk | Talk 08:52, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Jeff Koons (1 vote over 1 week)

[edit]

Support

  1. Hyacinth 21:08, 1 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Comments

Reasons for removal:

  • Lack of support after one week. -- ALargeElk | Talk 08:38, 9 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Cornelius Cardew (1 vote over 1 week)

[edit]

Support

  1. Dysprosia

Comments

  • Just adding a timestamp [[User:Sverdrup|❝Sverdrup❞]] 18:16, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Reasons for removal:

  • Lack of support after one week. -- ALoan (Talk) 12:10, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)

No Taxation Without Representation (1 vote over 1 week)

[edit]

Support

  1. Neutrality 04:27, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Reasons for removal:

  • Lack of support after one week. -- ALoan (Talk) 12:10, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Uniform Code of Military Justice (3 votes over 1 week)

[edit]

Support

  1. Neutrality 04:27, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  2. Isomorphic 05:43, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  3. Rmhermen 20:35, Jul 9, 2004 (UTC)


Reasons for removal:

  • Lack of support after one week. -- ALoan (Talk) 12:10, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Imperial Seal (3 votes over 1 week)

[edit]

Support

  1. Avala 20:02, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  2. [[User:OldakQuill|Oldak Quill]] 20:26, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  3. Sean Curtin 21:17, 10 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Comments

  • really nothing in this article but it is imperial seal of japan which is deadend article which doesnt even link to Japan Avala 15:34, 5 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  • Nobody to vote?

Reasons for removal:

  • Lack of support after one week. -- ALoan (Talk) 12:10, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Orange juice (3 votes over 1 week)

[edit]

Support

  1. Neutrality 02:19, 7 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  2. Ravn 12:54, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  3. Rmhermen 20:35, Jul 9, 2004 (UTC)

Reasons for removal:

  • Lack of support after one week. -- ALoan (Talk) 22:36, 14 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Politics of Cuba (2 votes over 1 week)

[edit]

Support

  1. Neutrality 03:17, 7 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  2. Ravn 12:54, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Reasons for removal:

  • Lack of support after one week. -- ALoan (Talk) 22:36, 14 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Lewis Libby (2 votes over 1 week)

[edit]

Support

  1. Neutrality 01:42, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  2. [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 17:53, 9 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Comments

  • Cheney's chief of staff. [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 17:53, 9 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Reasons for removal:

  • Lack of support after one week. -- ALoan (Talk) 09:57, 15 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Intelligentsia (2 votes over 1 week)

[edit]

Support

  1. Neutrality 05:10, Jul 8, 2004 (UTC)
  2. [[User:OldakQuill|Oldak Quill]] 20:26, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Comments

Reasons for removal:

  • Lack of support after one week. -- ALoan (Talk) 09:57, 15 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Health (1 vote over 1 week)

[edit]

Support

  1. Krik 16:32, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Reasons for removal:

  • Lack of support after one week. -- ALoan (Talk) 10:30, 16 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Sayed Qutb (3 votes over 1 week)

[edit]

Support

  1. Sarge Baldy 03:50, Jul 9, 2004 (UTC)
  2. csloat 19:51, 9 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  3. Ambivalenthysteria 22:42, 9 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Comments

  • I would think such an important Islamic philosopher could use a lot more information. Qutb's teachings have been one of the biggest influences on Islamic terrorism and in particular had an impact on Osama bin Laden. Sarge Baldy 03:50, Jul 9, 2004 (UTC)
  • I agree with the Sarge. There needs to be a lot more information here. csloat 19:51, 9 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Reasons for removal:

  • Lack of support after one week. -- ALoan (Talk) 10:30, 16 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Collaboration_of_the_week/Removed/2004/Archive_2&oldid=97138944"